No evidence of zoonotic viruses in selected captive and wild-caught grasscutters (Thryonomys swinderianus) in the ashanti region of ghana: a cross-sectional study

Emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases are a significant threat to public health globally. Thryonomys swinderianus (grasscutters) are widely hunted and farmed as a source of protein in Ghana, which introduces the possibility of zoonotic disease transmission between the animals and handlers. This study investigated the prevalence and zoonotic risks associated with handling grasscutters in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Laboratory analysis of 334 nasopharyngeal, oral, and rectal swabs from 117 grasscutters found no detectable cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, human rhinovirus, monkeypox virus, rotavirus, or enterovirus. Thirty handlers of captive and wild-caught grasscutters participated, comprising traders (57%), farmers (23%), and butchers (20%). Gender disparities were observed across occupations, with all butchers and farmers being male and all traders, female. While 87% of the handlers had formal education, only about 26% had knowledge of the zoonotic potential of grasscutters. Not all handlers regularly used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or practised hand hygiene, and neither was significantly associated with knowledge of zoonotic diseases (p = 0.7; p = 0.8). Fluid exposure occurred in 87% of handlers, mainly through splashes (70%), with PPE usage significantly reducing splash-related exposure (p < 0.001). Although the findings from this study indicated no immediate viral zoonotic threat from grasscutters in the sampled locations, it suggests surveillance should be continuously carried out through a One Health approach, especially as wildlife-human interactions increase. Also, educational campaigns and training should be targeted and consider biosafety practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Veterinary Research
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05413-y
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No evidence of zoonotic viruses in selected captive and wild-caught grasscutters (Thryonomys swinderianus) in the ashanti region of ghana: a cross-sectional study

Emmanuella Nyarko-Afriyie, Priscilla Mensah, Richmond Gorman, Richard Odame Phillips et al.
BMC Veterinary Research
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

No evidence of zoonotic viruses in selected captive and wild-caught grasscutters (Thryonomys swinderianus) in the ashanti region of ghana: a cross-sectional study

Emmanuella Nyarko-Afriyie, Priscilla Mensah, Richmond Gorman, Richard Odame Phillips, Sherihane Aryeetey, Jesse Addo Asamoah, Sascha Knauf, Constance Adu-Gyamfi, Richmond Yeboah, Ernest Oppong, Augustina Angelina Sylverken, Henry Kyeremateng Acheampong, Henrietta Dede Tetteh, Manuella Hayford, Michael Owusu, Sylvia Baffour Awuah
article en

Abstract

Emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases are a significant threat to public health globally. Thryonomys swinderianus (grasscutters) are widely hunted and farmed as a source of protein in Ghana, which introduces the possibility of zoonotic disease transmission between the animals and handlers. This study investigated the prevalence and zoonotic risks associated with handling grasscutters in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Laboratory analysis of 334 nasopharyngeal, oral, and rectal swabs from 117 grasscutters found no detectable cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, human rhinovirus, monkeypox virus, rotavirus, or enterovirus. Thirty handlers of captive and wild-caught grasscutters participated, comprising traders (57%), farmers (23%), and butchers (20%). Gender disparities were observed across occupations, with all butchers and farmers being male and all traders, female. While 87% of the handlers had formal education, only about 26% had knowledge of the zoonotic potential of grasscutters. Not all handlers regularly used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or practised hand hygiene, and neither was significantly associated with knowledge of zoonotic diseases (p = 0.7; p = 0.8). Fluid exposure occurred in 87% of handlers, mainly through splashes (70%), with PPE usage significantly reducing splash-related exposure (p < 0.001). Although the findings from this study indicated no immediate viral zoonotic threat from grasscutters in the sampled locations, it suggests surveillance should be continuously carried out through a One Health approach, especially as wildlife-human interactions increase. Also, educational campaigns and training should be targeted and consider biosafety practices.

BMC Veterinary Research
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Kumasi Technical University (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.