Twenty years of USAID and NIH eye health funding for Sub-Saharan Africa: A descriptive analysis of a bibliometric dataset

• U.S. federal agencies funded a large proportion of SSA eye health research • These agencies predominantly funded SSA trachoma research • USAID-funded publications increased over two decades prior to recent dissolution • Sustained funding may be essential for preventing avoidable blindness Given recent United States Agency for International Development (USAID) cuts and restructuring of National Institutes of Health (NIH) foreign subawards, we identify the proportion of eye health research publications from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) funded by the U.S. government, trends over twenty years, and publication characteristics associated with U.S. government funding between 2003 and 2022. A descriptive, bibliometric analysis. Eye-health research publications in SSA A systematic literature search of eye-health publications in SSA was performed. Following eligibility screening, 1,777 publications were included for manual data extraction and statistical analysis. Outcome measures included U.S.-government-, USAID-, and NIH-funded publications. USAID and the NIH funded 10% (98/960) and 16% (153/960) of SSA research publications that cited a funding source, respectively. The annual percentage of USAID-funded publications increased (p<0.001), but NIH-funded publications did not change (p=0.961), between 2003 and 2022. USAID- and NIH-funded publications were primarily focused on trachoma; listed as a funder for 19% (94/507) and 22% (113/507) of trachoma publications that cited funding sources. Publications in journals with medium (>2.5-4) and high (>4) impact factors had 6.3 [4.0, 10.0] (p<0.001) and 9.7 [6.2, 15.6] (p<0.001) times the odds of NIH funding vs no or low (0-2.5) impact factors. Randomized trials had 9.1 [6.3, 14.3] (p<0.001) times the odds of NIH funding vs other designs. USAID and the NIH were important funders in two decades of SSA eye-health research, especially related to trachoma control. Sustained U.S. federal investment and securing diversified funding sources may be essential for continued progress toward preventing avoidable blindness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJO International
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoint.2026.100243
Primary Topic
Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twenty years of USAID and NIH eye health funding for Sub-Saharan Africa: A descriptive analysis of a bibliometric dataset

Joshua R. Ehrlich, Vera Adobea Essuman, Deborah Goss, Scott K. Herrod et al.
AJO International
Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Twenty years of USAID and NIH eye health funding for Sub-Saharan Africa: A descriptive analysis of a bibliometric dataset

Joshua R. Ehrlich, Vera Adobea Essuman, Deborah Goss, Scott K. Herrod, Sadik Taju Sherief, Dupe Ademola-Popoola, Connor J. Alder, Edinam Hutton-Mensah, Khumbo Kalua, David S. Friedman, Yan Zhao
article en

Abstract

• U.S. federal agencies funded a large proportion of SSA eye health research • These agencies predominantly funded SSA trachoma research • USAID-funded publications increased over two decades prior to recent dissolution • Sustained funding may be essential for preventing avoidable blindness Given recent United States Agency for International Development (USAID) cuts and restructuring of National Institutes of Health (NIH) foreign subawards, we identify the proportion of eye health research publications from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) funded by the U.S. government, trends over twenty years, and publication characteristics associated with U.S. government funding between 2003 and 2022. A descriptive, bibliometric analysis. Eye-health research publications in SSA A systematic literature search of eye-health publications in SSA was performed. Following eligibility screening, 1,777 publications were included for manual data extraction and statistical analysis. Outcome measures included U.S.-government-, USAID-, and NIH-funded publications. USAID and the NIH funded 10% (98/960) and 16% (153/960) of SSA research publications that cited a funding source, respectively. The annual percentage of USAID-funded publications increased (p<0.001), but NIH-funded publications did not change (p=0.961), between 2003 and 2022. USAID- and NIH-funded publications were primarily focused on trachoma; listed as a funder for 19% (94/507) and 22% (113/507) of trachoma publications that cited funding sources. Publications in journals with medium (>2.5-4) and high (>4) impact factors had 6.3 [4.0, 10.0] (p<0.001) and 9.7 [6.2, 15.6] (p<0.001) times the odds of NIH funding vs no or low (0-2.5) impact factors. Randomized trials had 9.1 [6.3, 14.3] (p<0.001) times the odds of NIH funding vs other designs. USAID and the NIH were important funders in two decades of SSA eye-health research, especially related to trachoma control. Sustained U.S. federal investment and securing diversified funding sources may be essential for continued progress toward preventing avoidable blindness.

AJO InternationalVol. 3(2)
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), Harvard University (US), University of Ghana (GH), University of British Columbia (CA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (GH), Lemuel Shattuck Hospital (US), Blantyre Institute for Community Ophthalmology (MW), University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (NG), Institute for Social Research (NO), Addis Ababa University (ET)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.