Advocacy in nursing: A critical analysis of professional nursing’s response in Canada and the United States to the genocide of Palestinians

In this article, we analyse the response of professional nursing in Canada and the United States to the ongoing genocide occurring in Gaza. We do this by contextualizing the nursing profession’s ties to settler-colonialism in Canada. Employing frameworks of settler-colonialism and necropolitics, we interrogate the Israeli occupation’s systematic destruction of Gaza’s healthcare system or medicide , and the pre-existing healthcare disparities. Through the framework of epistemic disobedience we analyse two case studies: the politically motivated firing of nurse Hesen Jabr by New York’s Langone hospital and the politically motivated suspension of student nurse Arij Al Khafagi at the University of Manitoba. Both were disciplined for speaking out against the genocide of Palestinians. Finally, we offer a critical perspective on nursing advocacy, contrasting the response by professional nursing to the war in Ukraine and the genocide in Gaza. We contend that genuine advocacy is both an ethical duty and a basic nursing competency. It requires risk-taking by challenging the status quo on an individual, interpersonal and institutional level. We advocate for nursing organizations and nursing leaders to loosen their grip on the privileges of White supremacy in order to engage in politics to protect and support all people facing war and calamity, even if there is risk in doing so.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Iraq & the Arab World
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/jciaw_00169_1
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advocacy in nursing: A critical analysis of professional nursing’s response in Canada and the United States to the genocide of Palestinians

Vahedah Mehrabani, Natalie Stake-Doucet, Colombe Dimet, Julianne Blanchet et al.
Journal of Contemporary Iraq & the Arab World
Health and Conflict Studies
article

Advocacy in nursing: A critical analysis of professional nursing’s response in Canada and the United States to the genocide of Palestinians

Vahedah Mehrabani, Natalie Stake-Doucet, Colombe Dimet, Julianne Blanchet, Haifaa Khadour, Fatema Rashed
article en

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the response of professional nursing in Canada and the United States to the ongoing genocide occurring in Gaza. We do this by contextualizing the nursing profession’s ties to settler-colonialism in Canada. Employing frameworks of settler-colonialism and necropolitics, we interrogate the Israeli occupation’s systematic destruction of Gaza’s healthcare system or medicide , and the pre-existing healthcare disparities. Through the framework of epistemic disobedience we analyse two case studies: the politically motivated firing of nurse Hesen Jabr by New York’s Langone hospital and the politically motivated suspension of student nurse Arij Al Khafagi at the University of Manitoba. Both were disciplined for speaking out against the genocide of Palestinians. Finally, we offer a critical perspective on nursing advocacy, contrasting the response by professional nursing to the war in Ukraine and the genocide in Gaza. We contend that genuine advocacy is both an ethical duty and a basic nursing competency. It requires risk-taking by challenging the status quo on an individual, interpersonal and institutional level. We advocate for nursing organizations and nursing leaders to loosen their grip on the privileges of White supremacy in order to engage in politics to protect and support all people facing war and calamity, even if there is risk in doing so.

Journal of Contemporary Iraq & the Arab WorldVol. 19(2)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (CA), University of Toronto (CA), College & Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), American Association of Nurse Practitioners (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Health and Conflict Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.