Limb state accounts for differences between motor imagery and action in motor cortex

The motor cortex is involved not only in movement execution but also in motor imagery, a process leveraged by decoding algorithms for brain-computer interface (BCI) applications in individuals with severe motor impairments. Previous work has shown that population activity during execution and imagery occupies partially overlapping regions of neural state space while also engaging distinct subspaces unique to each motor state, suggesting that decoders trained in one condition may not generalize to the other. Moreover, movement execution likely includes neural representations of both motor output and proprioceptive feedback, which themselves may occupy distinct or overlapping regions of neural state space. To explore these distinctions, we studied two individuals with incomplete spinal-cord injuries and partial residual proximal arm function performing a center-out reaching task in three conditions: motor imagery, active execution, and passive movement. We found that decoders trained on neural activity from motor imagery failed to generalize to either active or passive movements. In contrast, decoders trained on active or passive movement activity generalized reciprocally. Population analysis revealed distinct dynamics depending on limb state and proprioceptive feedback, which could explain this lack of generalization. These results suggest that motor imagery engages motor cortical representations distinct from those recruited during actual movements, either actively or passively generated, with important implications for the design of BCI decoders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.13.26348353
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limb state accounts for differences between motor imagery and action in motor cortex

Milan Rybář, Charles M. Greenspon, Dalton D. Moore, John E. Downey et al.
medRxiv
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Limb state accounts for differences between motor imagery and action in motor cortex

Milan Rybář, Charles M. Greenspon, Dalton D. Moore, John E. Downey, Brian M Dekleva, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, Samantha N Johnson
article en

Abstract

The motor cortex is involved not only in movement execution but also in motor imagery, a process leveraged by decoding algorithms for brain-computer interface (BCI) applications in individuals with severe motor impairments. Previous work has shown that population activity during execution and imagery occupies partially overlapping regions of neural state space while also engaging distinct subspaces unique to each motor state, suggesting that decoders trained in one condition may not generalize to the other. Moreover, movement execution likely includes neural representations of both motor output and proprioceptive feedback, which themselves may occupy distinct or overlapping regions of neural state space. To explore these distinctions, we studied two individuals with incomplete spinal-cord injuries and partial residual proximal arm function performing a center-out reaching task in three conditions: motor imagery, active execution, and passive movement. We found that decoders trained on neural activity from motor imagery failed to generalize to either active or passive movements. In contrast, decoders trained on active or passive movement activity generalized reciprocally. Population analysis revealed distinct dynamics depending on limb state and proprioceptive feedback, which could explain this lack of generalization. These results suggest that motor imagery engages motor cortical representations distinct from those recruited during actual movements, either actively or passively generated, with important implications for the design of BCI decoders.

medRxiv
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Chicago (US), Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US), Neurological Surgery (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.