Affordability re-examined: beyond the health burden of safe water and clean cooking

Clean fuels and safe water have a clear role in averting devastating health outcomes, yet unaffordability remains a major barrier to their uptake and to correct and continued use. Within the global health field, we have no consistent answer to the question of how we know that something is affordable and for whom. In this Viewpoint, we draw on the literature and our own fieldwork in Tanzania, Mexico, and India to show that commonly used metrics of affordability do not represent the true burdens of affording safe water and clean cooking in low-income and middle-income countries. We discuss the explicit and implicit assumptions in existing affordability metrics and call for augmented measures to shape affordability policies for water and cooking that advance global health goals. Research and policy must be realistic about who the user is, what the user's constraints are, and how these constraints shape any meaningful affordability metric. Unrealistic affordability metrics can only hide affordability crises and hinder progress on global public health goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Global Health
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00528-5
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affordability re-examined: beyond the health burden of safe water and clean cooking

Isha Ray, Annelise Gill-Wiehl
The Lancet Global Health
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Affordability re-examined: beyond the health burden of safe water and clean cooking

Isha Ray, Annelise Gill-Wiehl
article en

Abstract

Clean fuels and safe water have a clear role in averting devastating health outcomes, yet unaffordability remains a major barrier to their uptake and to correct and continued use. Within the global health field, we have no consistent answer to the question of how we know that something is affordable and for whom. In this Viewpoint, we draw on the literature and our own fieldwork in Tanzania, Mexico, and India to show that commonly used metrics of affordability do not represent the true burdens of affording safe water and clean cooking in low-income and middle-income countries. We discuss the explicit and implicit assumptions in existing affordability metrics and call for augmented measures to shape affordability policies for water and cooking that advance global health goals. Research and policy must be realistic about who the user is, what the user's constraints are, and how these constraints shape any meaningful affordability metric. Unrealistic affordability metrics can only hide affordability crises and hinder progress on global public health goals.

The Lancet Global HealthVol. 14(4)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Columbia University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Affordability re-examined: beyond the health burden of safe water and clean cooking — Isha Ray, Annelise Gill-Wiehl · The Lancet Global Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS