Worldwide agroextractivism: A probabilistic approach

• We developed a novel index to quantify agroextractivism. • The analysis covered 23 countries across the globe. • Upper-Middle income countries exhibit the highest levels of agroextractivism. • State policies play a direct role in sustaining agroextractivism. Agroextractivism has increasingly attracted scientific attention, particularly within and from Latin America. While a substantial body of literature has emerged describing its main characteristics, there remains a significant gap regarding how to define and classify countries as agroextractivist, as well as how to compare the varying degrees or intensities of agroextractivism among them. Moreover, there is a lack of information on the probabilistic trajectories that may lead a country to adopt this model. In this article, we present a novel proposal that addresses both gaps. By applying a multidimensional approach at the global level, we develop an agroextractivism index and conduct a probabilistic analysis using panel data. Our results include the analysis of 23 countries across different regions. Of these, nine are classified as agroextractivist. Through the probabilistic analysis, we identify the variables that influence this process and present probabilistic trajectories for the period 2001–2021. We conclude by acknowledging that while the index provides only a limited perspective, its application allows us to identify a distinctive condition: the varying degrees of emphasis countries place on agricultural extractivism. Some are shifting significantly toward more intensive agricultural practices, while others show a less marked tendency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Development
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107394
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worldwide agroextractivism: A probabilistic approach

Andrés Suárez, Carlos David Cardona-Arenas
World Development
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Worldwide agroextractivism: A probabilistic approach

Andrés Suárez, Carlos David Cardona-Arenas
article en

Abstract

• We developed a novel index to quantify agroextractivism. • The analysis covered 23 countries across the globe. • Upper-Middle income countries exhibit the highest levels of agroextractivism. • State policies play a direct role in sustaining agroextractivism. Agroextractivism has increasingly attracted scientific attention, particularly within and from Latin America. While a substantial body of literature has emerged describing its main characteristics, there remains a significant gap regarding how to define and classify countries as agroextractivist, as well as how to compare the varying degrees or intensities of agroextractivism among them. Moreover, there is a lack of information on the probabilistic trajectories that may lead a country to adopt this model. In this article, we present a novel proposal that addresses both gaps. By applying a multidimensional approach at the global level, we develop an agroextractivism index and conduct a probabilistic analysis using panel data. Our results include the analysis of 23 countries across different regions. Of these, nine are classified as agroextractivist. Through the probabilistic analysis, we identify the variables that influence this process and present probabilistic trajectories for the period 2001–2021. We conclude by acknowledging that while the index provides only a limited perspective, its application allows us to identify a distinctive condition: the varying degrees of emphasis countries place on agricultural extractivism. Some are shifting significantly toward more intensive agricultural practices, while others show a less marked tendency.

World DevelopmentVol. 203
University of the Coast (CO), Universidad de Manizales (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.