Relationships Between Atmospheric Circulation and Southwestern United States 21st Century Precipitation Trends in Statistically Downscaled CMIP6 Models

Abstract Understanding future precipitation trends is vital for stakeholders and environmental managers in water‐limited regions such as the southwestern United States. Global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, however, project 21st century precipitation trends of varying sign in this region across seasons, even in models forced by an identical emissions scenario, reducing the ability of stakeholders and environmental managers to accurately plan for future water resources in the region. As global climate models generally have resolutions too coarse for local and regional environmental management, one broadly used method is the statistical downscaling of coarse resolution climate models onto higher resolution grids, using historical relationships between large‐ and small‐scale conditions. Previous work, however, has shown that future precipitation projections in non‐downscaled models in the southwestern United States are associated with the models' representation of the present‐day mid‐tropospheric ridge over western North America. Here we show that these relationships are largely maintained across seasons for models that have undergone univariate statistical downscaling following the localized constructed analogs technique, suggesting that the bias correction schemes used in univariate statistical downscaling alone do not correct for these associations. This work thus provides a cautionary tale for using statistically downscaled climate model data without also considering biases that are dynamically driven by the GCM's mean‐state atmospheric circulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd044419
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships Between Atmospheric Circulation and Southwestern United States 21st Century Precipitation Trends in Statistically Downscaled CMIP6 Models

Mitchell K. Kelleher, Kevin M. Grise, Phil E. Morefield
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Climate variability and models
article

Relationships Between Atmospheric Circulation and Southwestern United States 21st Century Precipitation Trends in Statistically Downscaled CMIP6 Models

Mitchell K. Kelleher, Kevin M. Grise, Phil E. Morefield
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding future precipitation trends is vital for stakeholders and environmental managers in water‐limited regions such as the southwestern United States. Global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, however, project 21st century precipitation trends of varying sign in this region across seasons, even in models forced by an identical emissions scenario, reducing the ability of stakeholders and environmental managers to accurately plan for future water resources in the region. As global climate models generally have resolutions too coarse for local and regional environmental management, one broadly used method is the statistical downscaling of coarse resolution climate models onto higher resolution grids, using historical relationships between large‐ and small‐scale conditions. Previous work, however, has shown that future precipitation projections in non‐downscaled models in the southwestern United States are associated with the models' representation of the present‐day mid‐tropospheric ridge over western North America. Here we show that these relationships are largely maintained across seasons for models that have undergone univariate statistical downscaling following the localized constructed analogs technique, suggesting that the bias correction schemes used in univariate statistical downscaling alone do not correct for these associations. This work thus provides a cautionary tale for using statistically downscaled climate model data without also considering biases that are dynamically driven by the GCM's mean‐state atmospheric circulation.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(6)
Environmental Protection Agency (US), Environmental Protection Agency (GH), Environmental Protection Agency (IE), University of Virginia (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.