Redo TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia After TEP/TAPP: Outcomes and feasibility

The optimal management of recurrent inguinal hernia following previous laparoendoscopic repair lacks robust scientific evidence and varies across guidelines. Due to a paucity of data, the European Hernia Society currently recommends open anterior repair for the management of recurrent inguinal hernias after a previous laparoendoscopic repair, based solely on expert opinion. However, repeat endoscopic repair can yield favorable outcomes in experienced hands. This study aimed to compare patient outcomes between repeat endoscopic repair (ReTEP) and the Lichtenstein technique for recurrent hernias after initial TAPP or TEP. Adult patients undergoing surgery for first recurrence after laparoendoscopic repair were included. Intra- and postoperative morbidity was analyzed retrospectively, and symptoms and quality of life were assessed prospectively using clinical and ultrasound examination, the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), and the COMI (Core Outcome Measurement Index)-Hernia questionnaire. Between January 2012 and March 2020, the center performed 48 ReTEPs and 45 Lichtenstein hernioplasties for the first recurrence of inguinal hernia after primary endoscopic surgery. Both groups were generally comparable in terms of age, BMI and intrinsic perioperative risk factors. The rate of conversion from ReTEP to Lichtenstein procedure was 27,3%, remained consistent over the years and showed no correlation with surgeon’s expertise. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency and severity of complications between ReTEP and Lichtenstein. The Lichtenstein procedure was significantly superior in the categories “foreign body sensation” and “pain” assessed using the CCS and the second recurrencies were more frequently observed after ReTEP. The findings support the expert suggestion of HerniaSurge group regarding the change of procedure for managing recurrent inguinal hernia following initial endoscopic surgery. In this case the Lichtenstein operation should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hernia
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03646-2
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redo TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia After TEP/TAPP: Outcomes and feasibility

Dirk Weyhe, Navid Tabriz, D Khmara
Hernia
Hernia repair and management
article

Redo TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia After TEP/TAPP: Outcomes and feasibility

Dirk Weyhe, Navid Tabriz, D Khmara
article en

Abstract

The optimal management of recurrent inguinal hernia following previous laparoendoscopic repair lacks robust scientific evidence and varies across guidelines. Due to a paucity of data, the European Hernia Society currently recommends open anterior repair for the management of recurrent inguinal hernias after a previous laparoendoscopic repair, based solely on expert opinion. However, repeat endoscopic repair can yield favorable outcomes in experienced hands. This study aimed to compare patient outcomes between repeat endoscopic repair (ReTEP) and the Lichtenstein technique for recurrent hernias after initial TAPP or TEP. Adult patients undergoing surgery for first recurrence after laparoendoscopic repair were included. Intra- and postoperative morbidity was analyzed retrospectively, and symptoms and quality of life were assessed prospectively using clinical and ultrasound examination, the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), and the COMI (Core Outcome Measurement Index)-Hernia questionnaire. Between January 2012 and March 2020, the center performed 48 ReTEPs and 45 Lichtenstein hernioplasties for the first recurrence of inguinal hernia after primary endoscopic surgery. Both groups were generally comparable in terms of age, BMI and intrinsic perioperative risk factors. The rate of conversion from ReTEP to Lichtenstein procedure was 27,3%, remained consistent over the years and showed no correlation with surgeon’s expertise. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency and severity of complications between ReTEP and Lichtenstein. The Lichtenstein procedure was significantly superior in the categories “foreign body sensation” and “pain” assessed using the CCS and the second recurrencies were more frequently observed after ReTEP. The findings support the expert suggestion of HerniaSurge group regarding the change of procedure for managing recurrent inguinal hernia following initial endoscopic surgery. In this case the Lichtenstein operation should be considered.

HerniaVol. 30(1)
Pius Hospital Oldenburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redo TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia After TEP/TAPP: Outcomes and feasibility — Dirk Weyhe, Navid Tabriz, et al. · Hernia (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS