Factors Influencing the Duration of Orthodontic Traction of Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The maxillary canine is the second-most frequently impacted tooth, affecting 1–3% of the population. It plays a crucial role in occlusion, facial esthetics, and arch development, making orthodontic traction the preferred approach over extraction or clinical monitoring without intervention. This systematic review aimed to identify the factors associated with the duration of orthodontic traction for impacted maxillary canines and to evaluate their influence. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and grey literature following PRISMA guidelines. Traction duration was defined as follows: (A) time from traction initiation to alignment; (B) time to cusp emergence; and (C) time to appliance removal. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I v2. Results: Out of 1156 initial studies, 43 were included in qualitative analysis and 24 in quantitative analysis. The pooled mean treatment duration was 43.13 months (95% CI: 32.50–53.77; I2 = 99.6%) for definition A, 44.81 months (95% CI: 23.28–66.34; I2 = 99.8%) for definition B, and 87.48 months (95% CI: 69.80–106.07) for definition C. Alpha angle, vertical height, and sector were the most frequently reported factors, potentially influencing traction duration. Meta-regression showed a significant association between mean patient age and treatment duration for definition B (β = −8.168, 95% CI: −15.299 to −1.037; p = 0.025), whereas no significant associations were observed for definition A. Heterogeneity across studies was high, and most non-randomized studies showed moderate to serious risk of bias, while randomized trials presented some concerns. Conclusions: Patient- and treatment-related factors, including higher alpha angle, greater vertical height, and more midline positioning, appear to influence traction duration. Despite variability across studies, these findings provide valuable insights for clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16062811
Primary Topic
dental development and anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing the Duration of Orthodontic Traction of Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Francisco Caramelo, Raquel Travassos, Catarina S. Nunes, Daniela Basto et al.
Applied Sciences
dental development and anomalies
article

Factors Influencing the Duration of Orthodontic Traction of Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Francisco Caramelo, Raquel Travassos, Catarina S. Nunes, Daniela Basto, Francisco Vale, Carlos Miguel Marto, Anabela Paula, Inês Francisco
article en

Abstract

Background: The maxillary canine is the second-most frequently impacted tooth, affecting 1–3% of the population. It plays a crucial role in occlusion, facial esthetics, and arch development, making orthodontic traction the preferred approach over extraction or clinical monitoring without intervention. This systematic review aimed to identify the factors associated with the duration of orthodontic traction for impacted maxillary canines and to evaluate their influence. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and grey literature following PRISMA guidelines. Traction duration was defined as follows: (A) time from traction initiation to alignment; (B) time to cusp emergence; and (C) time to appliance removal. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I v2. Results: Out of 1156 initial studies, 43 were included in qualitative analysis and 24 in quantitative analysis. The pooled mean treatment duration was 43.13 months (95% CI: 32.50–53.77; I2 = 99.6%) for definition A, 44.81 months (95% CI: 23.28–66.34; I2 = 99.8%) for definition B, and 87.48 months (95% CI: 69.80–106.07) for definition C. Alpha angle, vertical height, and sector were the most frequently reported factors, potentially influencing traction duration. Meta-regression showed a significant association between mean patient age and treatment duration for definition B (β = −8.168, 95% CI: −15.299 to −1.037; p = 0.025), whereas no significant associations were observed for definition A. Heterogeneity across studies was high, and most non-randomized studies showed moderate to serious risk of bias, while randomized trials presented some concerns. Conclusions: Patient- and treatment-related factors, including higher alpha angle, greater vertical height, and more midline positioning, appear to influence traction duration. Despite variability across studies, these findings provide valuable insights for clinical practice.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(6)
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
dental development and anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.