Substrate Scope in Organic Reactions: Comparison of Fingerprint-Based and Reactivity-Based Similarity Metrics

Recent advances in reaction development have led to a growing number of literature examples, wherein the number of applicable substrates is often used as an indicator of reaction utility. However, this parameter alone does not adequately reflect the actual reaction utility, with the key factor being the substrate diversity. In this study, reactivity-based molecular descriptors were compared with the structural similarity measure Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints (ECFP), and new evaluation metrics were proposed to quantify the substrate scope in organic reactions. By analyzing six reaction systems for the oxidative coupling of phenols, the potential substrate scope was successfully captured; notably, this was not reflected by the substrate count. Additionally, an evaluation framework exhibiting predictability, chemical validity, and informatic validity was developed. These findings are expected to provide guidelines for the design of substrates for future reaction developments. All source code and data are available on the GitHub repository at https://github.com/poclab-web/substrate-scope-metrics. The web interface is also available at https://github.com/poclab-web/streamlit-substrate-scope-metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c03167
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Substrate Scope in Organic Reactions: Comparison of Fingerprint-Based and Reactivity-Based Similarity Metrics

Hiroaki Gotoh, Takafumi Nishii, Kaname Ichizawa
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Substrate Scope in Organic Reactions: Comparison of Fingerprint-Based and Reactivity-Based Similarity Metrics

Hiroaki Gotoh, Takafumi Nishii, Kaname Ichizawa
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in reaction development have led to a growing number of literature examples, wherein the number of applicable substrates is often used as an indicator of reaction utility. However, this parameter alone does not adequately reflect the actual reaction utility, with the key factor being the substrate diversity. In this study, reactivity-based molecular descriptors were compared with the structural similarity measure Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints (ECFP), and new evaluation metrics were proposed to quantify the substrate scope in organic reactions. By analyzing six reaction systems for the oxidative coupling of phenols, the potential substrate scope was successfully captured; notably, this was not reflected by the substrate count. Additionally, an evaluation framework exhibiting predictability, chemical validity, and informatic validity was developed. These findings are expected to provide guidelines for the design of substrates for future reaction developments. All source code and data are available on the GitHub repository at https://github.com/poclab-web/substrate-scope-metrics. The web interface is also available at https://github.com/poclab-web/streamlit-substrate-scope-metrics.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Yokohama National University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.