Social Isolation Typologies Among Older Adults: The Intersection of Gender and Sexual Identity

Research shows that older lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults report higher social isolation than straight counterparts, while others find higher isolation among transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) than cisgender peers. Yet few nationally representative studies examine both objective and subjective isolation across gender and sexual identity. Drawing on theories of double disadvantage and minority resilience, we analyze recent Household Pulse Survey data for U.S. adults aged 50+ ( N = 216,930) to identify four isolation typologies: “the connected” (not isolated, not lonely), “lonely-in-a-crowd” (not isolated, lonely), “lone farmers” (isolated, not lonely), and “the vulnerable” (isolated, lonely). “The connected” group was most prevalent, though mismatches between isolation dimensions were common. A stepwise gradient emerged across sex assigned at birth: cisgender straight adults were most advantaged, TGNB LGB + adults most disadvantaged, and single-minority groups intermediate. For mismatched typologies, sexual minority stigma appeared more salient than gender minority stigma. These findings underscore the value of multidimensional and intersectional approaches to understanding social isolation in later life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Aging
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275261435533
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Isolation Typologies Among Older Adults: The Intersection of Gender and Sexual Identity

Haoming Song, Yuanchang Zhao
Research on Aging
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Social Isolation Typologies Among Older Adults: The Intersection of Gender and Sexual Identity

Haoming Song, Yuanchang Zhao
article en

Abstract

Research shows that older lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults report higher social isolation than straight counterparts, while others find higher isolation among transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) than cisgender peers. Yet few nationally representative studies examine both objective and subjective isolation across gender and sexual identity. Drawing on theories of double disadvantage and minority resilience, we analyze recent Household Pulse Survey data for U.S. adults aged 50+ ( N = 216,930) to identify four isolation typologies: “the connected” (not isolated, not lonely), “lonely-in-a-crowd” (not isolated, lonely), “lone farmers” (isolated, not lonely), and “the vulnerable” (isolated, lonely). “The connected” group was most prevalent, though mismatches between isolation dimensions were common. A stepwise gradient emerged across sex assigned at birth: cisgender straight adults were most advantaged, TGNB LGB + adults most disadvantaged, and single-minority groups intermediate. For mismatched typologies, sexual minority stigma appeared more salient than gender minority stigma. These findings underscore the value of multidimensional and intersectional approaches to understanding social isolation in later life.

Research on Aging
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.