EEG in the Emergency Department: When the Neurophysiological Test Can Be Avoided in Emergency Diagnostic Workups? The EMINENCE Study

<b>Introduction</b>: This study was conducted to determine whether specific emergency physician (EP) diagnoses and/or neurological signs/symptoms upon admission to the Emergency Department (ED) were associated with normal/non-informative emergency electroencephalogram (emEEG). <b>Methods:</b> Data from consecutive patients admitted to the ED of our tertiary hospital over a two-year period (1 January 2023-31 December 2024) were analyzed retrospectively. We evaluated the correlation between normal/non-specific emEEGs and EP admission diagnoses and neurological signs/symptoms on admission. Epileptic discharges and sharp waves with triphasic morphology were considered specific patterns. <b>Results</b>: A total of 2008 patients underwent emEEG recording during the study period. EmEEGs were considered non-informative in 100% of global amnesia diagnoses, 100% of cases of mild head trauma, 100% of cases of migraine with aura, 98.3% of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), 95.6% of transient losses of consciousness (TLCs) when seizure was not the primary suspected diagnosis, and in 92.7% of falls of unknown dynamics. Epileptic patterns were detected in 4% of patients presenting with TLC and in 2.4% of those with falls of unknown dynamics, with approximately half of these patients having a pre-existing diagnosis of epilepsy. Triphasic waves were detected in 4.9% patients with falls of unknown dynamics, in 1.7% with TIA, and in 0.4% with TLC. All of these patients had fever/sepsis or metabolic/electrolyte disorders. Overall, across all clinical scenarios, emEEGs were considered non-informative in 385 (19.1%) tested patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> emEEGs are almost non-informative in the diagnostic pathway for patients with global amnesia, mild head trauma, and migraine with aura, and in patients with TIA, TLC, or falls of unknown dynamics. EPs can safely consider avoiding emEEGs in the absence of previous epilepsy diagnosis, fever/sepsis, metabolic/electrolyte disturbances, or drug abuse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology International
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint18030054
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EEG in the Emergency Department: When the Neurophysiological Test Can Be Avoided in Emergency Diagnostic Workups? The EMINENCE Study

Cristina Lam Lam Mei, Laura Betti, Roberto Fratangelo, Andrea Nencioni et al.
Neurology International
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

EEG in the Emergency Department: When the Neurophysiological Test Can Be Avoided in Emergency Diagnostic Workups? The EMINENCE Study

Cristina Lam Lam Mei, Laura Betti, Roberto Fratangelo, Andrea Nencioni, Peiman Nazerian, Federica Barraco, Arianna Fabbri, Maenia Scarpino, Antonello Grippo, Benedetta Piccardi
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: This study was conducted to determine whether specific emergency physician (EP) diagnoses and/or neurological signs/symptoms upon admission to the Emergency Department (ED) were associated with normal/non-informative emergency electroencephalogram (emEEG). <b>Methods:</b> Data from consecutive patients admitted to the ED of our tertiary hospital over a two-year period (1 January 2023-31 December 2024) were analyzed retrospectively. We evaluated the correlation between normal/non-specific emEEGs and EP admission diagnoses and neurological signs/symptoms on admission. Epileptic discharges and sharp waves with triphasic morphology were considered specific patterns. <b>Results</b>: A total of 2008 patients underwent emEEG recording during the study period. EmEEGs were considered non-informative in 100% of global amnesia diagnoses, 100% of cases of mild head trauma, 100% of cases of migraine with aura, 98.3% of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), 95.6% of transient losses of consciousness (TLCs) when seizure was not the primary suspected diagnosis, and in 92.7% of falls of unknown dynamics. Epileptic patterns were detected in 4% of patients presenting with TLC and in 2.4% of those with falls of unknown dynamics, with approximately half of these patients having a pre-existing diagnosis of epilepsy. Triphasic waves were detected in 4.9% patients with falls of unknown dynamics, in 1.7% with TIA, and in 0.4% with TLC. All of these patients had fever/sepsis or metabolic/electrolyte disorders. Overall, across all clinical scenarios, emEEGs were considered non-informative in 385 (19.1%) tested patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> emEEGs are almost non-informative in the diagnostic pathway for patients with global amnesia, mild head trauma, and migraine with aura, and in patients with TIA, TLC, or falls of unknown dynamics. EPs can safely consider avoiding emEEGs in the absence of previous epilepsy diagnosis, fever/sepsis, metabolic/electrolyte disturbances, or drug abuse.

Neurology InternationalVol. 18(3)
University of Milan (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Ospedale San Giuseppe (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.