The “power to pollute” and “post-neoliberal” climate finance

Abstract Since 2021, Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) provide finance to middle-income countries (MICs) whose energy profile is largely powered by coal—those countries with what we call the “power to pollute.” Using the case of South Africa’s JETP, the most mature of all such agreements, we assess whether the JETP model in fact enables MICs to pursue industrial policy innovations that parallel emergent “post-neoliberal” policy paradigms of rich countries. We draw on analysis of semi-structured interviews with South African policy-makers, policy documents, white papers, and pronouncements at public events between 2021 and 2024. We argue that JETP financing is unlikely to enable the rise of green industrial policies typical of “post-neoliberal” approaches in rich countries, despite the hopes of recipient countries entering into these agreements. This type of financing is instead becoming a mechanism to constrain domestic policy flexibility—and domestic politics—for carbon emissions mitigation, often reinforcing neoliberal principles in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Review
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwag015
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “power to pollute” and “post-neoliberal” climate finance

Aishwarya Swamidurai, Benjamin H. Bradlow
Socio-Economic Review
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

The “power to pollute” and “post-neoliberal” climate finance

Aishwarya Swamidurai, Benjamin H. Bradlow
article en

Abstract

Abstract Since 2021, Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) provide finance to middle-income countries (MICs) whose energy profile is largely powered by coal—those countries with what we call the “power to pollute.” Using the case of South Africa’s JETP, the most mature of all such agreements, we assess whether the JETP model in fact enables MICs to pursue industrial policy innovations that parallel emergent “post-neoliberal” policy paradigms of rich countries. We draw on analysis of semi-structured interviews with South African policy-makers, policy documents, white papers, and pronouncements at public events between 2021 and 2024. We argue that JETP financing is unlikely to enable the rise of green industrial policies typical of “post-neoliberal” approaches in rich countries, despite the hopes of recipient countries entering into these agreements. This type of financing is instead becoming a mechanism to constrain domestic policy flexibility—and domestic politics—for carbon emissions mitigation, often reinforcing neoliberal principles in practice.

Socio-Economic Review
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Princeton Public Schools (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.