Emotional synchrony predicts social cohesion effects following costly rituals

This manuscript explores two explanatory models of participation in university hazing, a typical example of costly ritual: the Shared Pathway Model and the Emotional Synchronization Model. Two correlational (N = 85 and 76) and one longitudinal study (N = 120 + 258) based on self-reported measures were conducted in highly ecological contexts to assess the predictive value of the two explanatory models on social cohesion (i.e., social identification and identity fusion) and well-being (i.e., life satisfaction, self-esteem and loneliness). Across studies, emotional synchronization consistently predicted social cohesion and well-being, both immediately and up to 4 months post-ritual. In contrast, the Shared Pathway Model showed only weak associations with short-term social identification and failed to explain long-term effects. A meta-analysis confirmed these results. These findings offer novel empirical support for the role of emotional synchronization in explaining the enduring psychosocial effects of costly rituals. We discuss implications for ritual theory and suggest future research on why some rituals foster strong social bonds while others lead to exclusion or fail to generate cohesion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70064
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional synchrony predicts social cohesion effects following costly rituals

J.L. Pizarro, Bernard Rimé, Darío Páez, Jon Zabala et al.
British Journal of Social Psychology
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
article

Emotional synchrony predicts social cohesion effects following costly rituals

J.L. Pizarro, Bernard Rimé, Darío Páez, Jon Zabala, Pierre Bouchat
article en

Abstract

This manuscript explores two explanatory models of participation in university hazing, a typical example of costly ritual: the Shared Pathway Model and the Emotional Synchronization Model. Two correlational (N = 85 and 76) and one longitudinal study (N = 120 + 258) based on self-reported measures were conducted in highly ecological contexts to assess the predictive value of the two explanatory models on social cohesion (i.e., social identification and identity fusion) and well-being (i.e., life satisfaction, self-esteem and loneliness). Across studies, emotional synchronization consistently predicted social cohesion and well-being, both immediately and up to 4 months post-ritual. In contrast, the Shared Pathway Model showed only weak associations with short-term social identification and failed to explain long-term effects. A meta-analysis confirmed these results. These findings offer novel empirical support for the role of emotional synchronization in explaining the enduring psychosocial effects of costly rituals. We discuss implications for ritual theory and suggest future research on why some rituals foster strong social bonds while others lead to exclusion or fail to generate cohesion.

British Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 65(2)
University of the Basque Country (ES), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Basque Culinary Center (ES), Universidad Católica del Norte (CL), Universidad Católica de Temuco (CL), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), Fomento de San Sebastián (Spain) (ES), Université de Lorraine (FR), UCLouvain (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.