Exploring of the impact of AI feedback on college students' critical thinking: a intervention experiment based on design discipline

Introduction Artificial intelligence-driven feedback and assessment have become increasingly important teaching approaches in design education. However, empirical evidence regarding their impact on students' critical thinking remains limited. Methods To address this gap, this study employed a mixed-methods design involving a three-week intervention with 70 undergraduate design students. Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group ( n = 38) and a control group ( n = 32), both with comparable academic backgrounds. Standardized instruments were used to measure students' critical thinking abilities before and after the intervention. During an age-friendly design workshop, the experimental group received AI-assisted feedback and assessment, while the control group completed the same instructional activities without AI support. Results The results indicated that the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in critical thinking abilities compared to the control group after the intervention ( p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis further revealed several mechanisms through which AI-assisted feedback supported students' reflective thinking, iterative design processes, and problem-solving strategies. Discussion These findings suggest that AI- effectively enhance critical thinking in design education. The study contributes empirical evidence to the growing body of research on AI-supported learning and provides practical implications for integrating AI tools into workshop-based design instruction to foster higher-order thinking skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1806913
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring of the impact of AI feedback on college students' critical thinking: a intervention experiment based on design discipline

Tianyue Niu, Jinhua Yang
Frontiers in Psychology
Design Education and Practice
article

Exploring of the impact of AI feedback on college students' critical thinking: a intervention experiment based on design discipline

Tianyue Niu, Jinhua Yang
article en

Abstract

Introduction Artificial intelligence-driven feedback and assessment have become increasingly important teaching approaches in design education. However, empirical evidence regarding their impact on students' critical thinking remains limited. Methods To address this gap, this study employed a mixed-methods design involving a three-week intervention with 70 undergraduate design students. Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group ( n = 38) and a control group ( n = 32), both with comparable academic backgrounds. Standardized instruments were used to measure students' critical thinking abilities before and after the intervention. During an age-friendly design workshop, the experimental group received AI-assisted feedback and assessment, while the control group completed the same instructional activities without AI support. Results The results indicated that the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in critical thinking abilities compared to the control group after the intervention ( p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis further revealed several mechanisms through which AI-assisted feedback supported students' reflective thinking, iterative design processes, and problem-solving strategies. Discussion These findings suggest that AI- effectively enhance critical thinking in design education. The study contributes empirical evidence to the growing body of research on AI-supported learning and provides practical implications for integrating AI tools into workshop-based design instruction to foster higher-order thinking skills.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Tongji University (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.