Scotland’s twin referendums: revealing regional divides behind national votes

Scotland’s 2014 independence referendum and the 2016 EU referendum are often interpreted as politically aligned at the national scale, reinforcing a simplified narrative of a strongly pro-independence, pro-EU portion of the Scottish electorate. This regional graphic challenges that view using a bivariate, population-weighted cartogram that jointly visualises both votes across parliamentary constituencies. By correcting for uneven population distributions and revealing sub-regional variation, the graphic exposes multi-scalar political cleavages within cities, regions and economic hinterlands. The visualisation demonstrates how national aggregates obscure regional political heterogeneity and highlights the value of spatially explicit graphics for interpreting constitutional and electoral change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Studies Regional Science
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2026.2637381
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scotland’s twin referendums: revealing regional divides behind national votes

M. Wang, Craig J. A. Stewart, Xinyi Yuan
Regional Studies Regional Science
Political Systems and Governance
article

Scotland’s twin referendums: revealing regional divides behind national votes

M. Wang, Craig J. A. Stewart, Xinyi Yuan
article en

Abstract

Scotland’s 2014 independence referendum and the 2016 EU referendum are often interpreted as politically aligned at the national scale, reinforcing a simplified narrative of a strongly pro-independence, pro-EU portion of the Scottish electorate. This regional graphic challenges that view using a bivariate, population-weighted cartogram that jointly visualises both votes across parliamentary constituencies. By correcting for uneven population distributions and revealing sub-regional variation, the graphic exposes multi-scalar political cleavages within cities, regions and economic hinterlands. The visualisation demonstrates how national aggregates obscure regional political heterogeneity and highlights the value of spatially explicit graphics for interpreting constitutional and electoral change.

Regional Studies Regional ScienceVol. 13(1)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.