Bias beyond borders: quantifying gender and ethnic stereotypes across countries in AI image generation

This study proposes a multi-layered framework to quantify gender and ethnic bias in state-of-the-art text-to-image models using geographically grounded evaluations across ten American countries. We evaluate Stable Diffusion 1.5, SDXL, Gemini, Flux, and DALL.E by creating two datasets: one organized by race–gender categories and another using only nationality prompts. Using CLIP embeddings, we extract demographic representations through three methods: (i) a KNN classifier trained solely on model-generated demographic exemplars; (ii) a distance-based comparison of country-level embedding centroids to race–gender centroids; and (iii) a semantic layer from a multimodal LLM that infers demographic attributes from each portrait. An autoencoder provides latent-space visualizations for interpretable geometric inspection of cross-country patterns. Across models, we find systematic deviations from real census distributions, including consistent male overrepresentation (except Gemini, which skews female) and strong ethnic homogenization. Latin American countries are repeatedly mapped to Indigenous archetypes, while Canada and the United States are largely rendered with White prototypes. These distortions appear in both embedding geometry and LLM-based semantic judgments, indicating that bias affects low-level visual structure and high-level interpretation. By linking synthetic portraits to demographic baselines, this study offers a scalable method to audit representational fairness in AI models and stresses the need for culturally contextualized evaluation in responsible AI development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01066-7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias beyond borders: quantifying gender and ethnic stereotypes across countries in AI image generation

Kelton Augusto Pontara da Costa, Regilene Aparecida Sarzi-Ribeiro, João Paulo Papa, Giovanni Franco et al.
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Bias beyond borders: quantifying gender and ethnic stereotypes across countries in AI image generation

Kelton Augusto Pontara da Costa, Regilene Aparecida Sarzi-Ribeiro, João Paulo Papa, Giovanni Franco, Felipe Mahlow
article en

Abstract

This study proposes a multi-layered framework to quantify gender and ethnic bias in state-of-the-art text-to-image models using geographically grounded evaluations across ten American countries. We evaluate Stable Diffusion 1.5, SDXL, Gemini, Flux, and DALL.E by creating two datasets: one organized by race–gender categories and another using only nationality prompts. Using CLIP embeddings, we extract demographic representations through three methods: (i) a KNN classifier trained solely on model-generated demographic exemplars; (ii) a distance-based comparison of country-level embedding centroids to race–gender centroids; and (iii) a semantic layer from a multimodal LLM that infers demographic attributes from each portrait. An autoencoder provides latent-space visualizations for interpretable geometric inspection of cross-country patterns. Across models, we find systematic deviations from real census distributions, including consistent male overrepresentation (except Gemini, which skews female) and strong ethnic homogenization. Latin American countries are repeatedly mapped to Indigenous archetypes, while Canada and the United States are largely rendered with White prototypes. These distortions appear in both embedding geometry and LLM-based semantic judgments, indicating that bias affects low-level visual structure and high-level interpretation. By linking synthetic portraits to demographic baselines, this study offers a scalable method to audit representational fairness in AI models and stresses the need for culturally contextualized evaluation in responsible AI development.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(2)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.