Carbon Emission Efficiency Differences Between Coastal and Inland Cities in China: Insights from Climate Cost Analysis

Global environmental issues are becoming increasingly severe, with climate change imposing varying degrees of economic impact on different cities. It is crucial for cities to pursue efficient, low-carbon, and sustainable development pathways to cope with climate change. Carbon emission efficiency (CEE) is an essential indicator for assessing their performance and progress toward low-carbon growth. However, traditional CEE assessments have yet to integrate regional differences in the socioeconomic costs of climate change. To fill this gap, we have built a combined efficient frontier Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model based on the weighted carbon emissions of each city’s climate costs to evaluate the CEEs of 252 cities in China from 2006 to 2021. Meanwhile, city classification and spatial Markov chains are used for spatio-temporal heterogeneity analysis, and finally, the efficiency is decomposed to determine the impact of different factors on carbon efficiency. The results indicate that the average CEE of coastal cities (0.57) is lower than that of inland cities (0.63), mainly due to higher climate costs and unbalanced development. In contrast, megacities and super-large cities in coastal areas have the highest CEE levels because of economies of scale and technological advantages. Efficiency decomposition shows that pure technical efficiency (PTE) is the primary driver of CEE differences, contributing 33.37% to inefficiency differences. Our findings emphasize the need for targeted, differentiated policies to address unique urban challenges. Green technology investments should be prioritized in areas with high emission reduction potential, while cross-regional technology diffusion mechanisms should be established in areas with medium reduction potential to foster innovation. Overall, this study could offer valuable insights into the sustainable and low-carbon transition of urban development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Science
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10030159
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Emission Efficiency Differences Between Coastal and Inland Cities in China: Insights from Climate Cost Analysis

Cuicui Feng, Siqi Li, Guanqiong Ye, Xuhui He et al.
Urban Science
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Carbon Emission Efficiency Differences Between Coastal and Inland Cities in China: Insights from Climate Cost Analysis

Cuicui Feng, Siqi Li, Guanqiong Ye, Xuhui He, Cheng Xue
article en

Abstract

Global environmental issues are becoming increasingly severe, with climate change imposing varying degrees of economic impact on different cities. It is crucial for cities to pursue efficient, low-carbon, and sustainable development pathways to cope with climate change. Carbon emission efficiency (CEE) is an essential indicator for assessing their performance and progress toward low-carbon growth. However, traditional CEE assessments have yet to integrate regional differences in the socioeconomic costs of climate change. To fill this gap, we have built a combined efficient frontier Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model based on the weighted carbon emissions of each city’s climate costs to evaluate the CEEs of 252 cities in China from 2006 to 2021. Meanwhile, city classification and spatial Markov chains are used for spatio-temporal heterogeneity analysis, and finally, the efficiency is decomposed to determine the impact of different factors on carbon efficiency. The results indicate that the average CEE of coastal cities (0.57) is lower than that of inland cities (0.63), mainly due to higher climate costs and unbalanced development. In contrast, megacities and super-large cities in coastal areas have the highest CEE levels because of economies of scale and technological advantages. Efficiency decomposition shows that pure technical efficiency (PTE) is the primary driver of CEE differences, contributing 33.37% to inefficiency differences. Our findings emphasize the need for targeted, differentiated policies to address unique urban challenges. Green technology investments should be prioritized in areas with high emission reduction potential, while cross-regional technology diffusion mechanisms should be established in areas with medium reduction potential to foster innovation. Overall, this study could offer valuable insights into the sustainable and low-carbon transition of urban development.

Urban ScienceVol. 10(3)
Zhejiang Ocean University (CN), Zhoushan Hospital (CN), Sanya University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, Government of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.