Beyond calories: a sociological food security index for measuring entitlements, power, and cultural resilience in Pakistan's agrarian communities

Introduction Food Security in the Global South is typically measured through caloric intake or economic indicators, neglecting the structural, cultural, and historical forces that shape access. This study critiques neoliberal food security metrics by co-developing, with agrarian communities, a sociological index that quantifies colonial legacies, corporate control, and gendered deprivation. Methods Using a participatory approach, deliberative workshops ( n = 98 stakeholders) and a household survey ( n = 379) were conducted. The study operationalized four dimensions historical context, cultural entitlement, structural barriers, and critical consciousness into 20 Likert-scale items. The index was developed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and relationships between variables were analyzed using a generalized linear model path analysis. Results The EFA yielded a preliminary 6-factor structure (e.g., “cultural sovereignty”, “structural deprivation”) with strong reliability (α = 0.720.84). The path analysis revealed a pattern where education appeared to mediate 94% of income's statistical association with the Sociological Food Security Index (SFSI) (β = 0.094, p < 0.001). Patriarchal family structures were associated with direct negative impacts (β = −0.210, p < 0.001), while age emerged as the strongest positive predictor (β = 0.319, p < 0.001), underscoring the protective role of intergenerational knowledge. Strikingly, income showed no significant direct association with food security (β = 0.002, p = 0.981), challenging economic reductionism. Discussion and conclusion The SFSI represents advancement in food security scholarship by attempting to quantify asymmetries (e.g., “Ration shops cheat us”) and cultural erosion (e.g., “Youth reject traditional foods”). For Pakistan and similar contexts, findings advocate for education-linked agrarian reform, gender-transformative food programs, and policies curbing corporate control. This research suggests a paradigm shift from calorie counting to entitlement-based solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1668641
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond calories: a sociological food security index for measuring entitlements, power, and cultural resilience in Pakistan's agrarian communities

Younas Khan
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Beyond calories: a sociological food security index for measuring entitlements, power, and cultural resilience in Pakistan's agrarian communities

Younas Khan
article en

Abstract

Introduction Food Security in the Global South is typically measured through caloric intake or economic indicators, neglecting the structural, cultural, and historical forces that shape access. This study critiques neoliberal food security metrics by co-developing, with agrarian communities, a sociological index that quantifies colonial legacies, corporate control, and gendered deprivation. Methods Using a participatory approach, deliberative workshops ( n = 98 stakeholders) and a household survey ( n = 379) were conducted. The study operationalized four dimensions historical context, cultural entitlement, structural barriers, and critical consciousness into 20 Likert-scale items. The index was developed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and relationships between variables were analyzed using a generalized linear model path analysis. Results The EFA yielded a preliminary 6-factor structure (e.g., “cultural sovereignty”, “structural deprivation”) with strong reliability (α = 0.720.84). The path analysis revealed a pattern where education appeared to mediate 94% of income's statistical association with the Sociological Food Security Index (SFSI) (β = 0.094, p < 0.001). Patriarchal family structures were associated with direct negative impacts (β = −0.210, p < 0.001), while age emerged as the strongest positive predictor (β = 0.319, p < 0.001), underscoring the protective role of intergenerational knowledge. Strikingly, income showed no significant direct association with food security (β = 0.002, p = 0.981), challenging economic reductionism. Discussion and conclusion The SFSI represents advancement in food security scholarship by attempting to quantify asymmetries (e.g., “Ration shops cheat us”) and cultural erosion (e.g., “Youth reject traditional foods”). For Pakistan and similar contexts, findings advocate for education-linked agrarian reform, gender-transformative food programs, and policies curbing corporate control. This research suggests a paradigm shift from calorie counting to entitlement-based solutions.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 10
East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.