The Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Model Selected Strength Parameters of the Giant Miscanthus Stalk

The aim of this work was to develop a model using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to predict stem cutting parameters for giant miscanthus. Experimental studies were conducted to determine biometric traits: maximum stem diameter (<i>Dmax</i>), minimum stem diameter (<i>Dmin</i>), stem wall thickness (<i>THwall</i>), and strength parameters (cutting force, cutting work) for two giant miscanthus genotypes, depending on the internode number (<i>NrNod</i>) and water content (<i>MC</i>). A total of 600 measurement results were obtained, which were randomly divided into training (60%), test (20%), and validation (20%) subsets. Two semantic models were adopted: one for predicting stem cutting force (ann1) and one for predicting cutting work (ann2). The independent variables (ANN inputs) were: <i>Gen</i>, <i>MC</i>, <i>NrNod</i>, <i>Dmax</i>, <i>Dmin</i>, and <i>THwall</i>. The ANN creation process was performed using Statistica Neural Networks. For each of the two semantic models (ANN1 and ANN2), 100 neural networks were developed, with the top 10 ANNs retained for further analysis. The criterion for selecting the best neural network was the root mean square error (RMSE) for the test subset. For ANN1, the RMSE values varied from 6.89 N to 8.70 N. For ANN2, the RMSE values varied from 0.086 J to 0.102 J. For the most accurate ANN1-03 (MLP 7-10-1), used to predict grass cutting force, the RMSE values were 6.46 N-6.89 N-4.70 N for the training, test, and validation subsets. For the most accurate ANN2-02 (MLP 7-10-1), used to predict grass cutting work, the RMSE values were 0.0646 J-0.0857 J-0.0596 J for the training, test, and validation subsets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061162
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Model Selected Strength Parameters of the Giant Miscanthus Stalk

Tomasz Hebda, Z. Ślipek, Sławomir Francik, Beata Brzychczyk et al.
Materials
Bioenergy crop production and management
article

The Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Model Selected Strength Parameters of the Giant Miscanthus Stalk

Tomasz Hebda, Z. Ślipek, Sławomir Francik, Beata Brzychczyk, Renata Francik
article en

Abstract

The aim of this work was to develop a model using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to predict stem cutting parameters for giant miscanthus. Experimental studies were conducted to determine biometric traits: maximum stem diameter (<i>Dmax</i>), minimum stem diameter (<i>Dmin</i>), stem wall thickness (<i>THwall</i>), and strength parameters (cutting force, cutting work) for two giant miscanthus genotypes, depending on the internode number (<i>NrNod</i>) and water content (<i>MC</i>). A total of 600 measurement results were obtained, which were randomly divided into training (60%), test (20%), and validation (20%) subsets. Two semantic models were adopted: one for predicting stem cutting force (ann1) and one for predicting cutting work (ann2). The independent variables (ANN inputs) were: <i>Gen</i>, <i>MC</i>, <i>NrNod</i>, <i>Dmax</i>, <i>Dmin</i>, and <i>THwall</i>. The ANN creation process was performed using Statistica Neural Networks. For each of the two semantic models (ANN1 and ANN2), 100 neural networks were developed, with the top 10 ANNs retained for further analysis. The criterion for selecting the best neural network was the root mean square error (RMSE) for the test subset. For ANN1, the RMSE values varied from 6.89 N to 8.70 N. For ANN2, the RMSE values varied from 0.086 J to 0.102 J. For the most accurate ANN1-03 (MLP 7-10-1), used to predict grass cutting force, the RMSE values were 6.46 N-6.89 N-4.70 N for the training, test, and validation subsets. For the most accurate ANN2-02 (MLP 7-10-1), used to predict grass cutting work, the RMSE values were 0.0646 J-0.0857 J-0.0596 J for the training, test, and validation subsets.

MaterialsVol. 19(6)
University of Agriculture in Krakow (PL), Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Nowym Sączu (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Bioenergy crop production and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.