Clinical study on the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by balanced jar therapy with flexible corrective appropriate technology

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of balanced jar therapy combined with the Flexible Corrective Appropriate Technology (FCAT) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods This randomized, single-blind study enrolled adolescents with AIS from October 2022 to September 2024. Participants were divided into control and observation groups. The control group received flexible bracing for at least 6 months, while the observation group received an additional 2-week course of balanced cupping therapy-including flash, kneading, pushing, retention, and removal cupping techniques. Primary outcomes, which include the reduction in Cobb angle and apical transverse rotation (ATR), were assessed at 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes, including gait parameters, plantar pressure measures, spinal mobility, adverse events, and quality of life, were also evaluated at the same timepoints. Results The observation group demonstrated significantly greater reduction in Cobb angle (24.16 ± 3.25 vs. 26.98 ± 3.87, P = 0.007) and ATR (10.24 ± 1.66 vs. 11.79 ± 1.83, P = 0.003) at 3 months. The plantar pressure indices, particularly the center of pressure excursion index (CPEI), showed significantly greater improvement in the observation group (8.87 ± 2.17 vs. 10.54 ± 2.21, P = 0.020). Changes in apical vertebral rotation (AVR) ( P = 0.001) and the distance of the apical vertebral translation (AVT) ( P < 0.001) were observed within the observation group, but between-group comparisons showed no statistical significance. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for gait parameters and spinal mobility measurements ( P > 0.05). The combined treatment showed favorable safety (8.00% vs. 14.46%, P = 0.37) and significantly better quality of life outcomes ( P < 0.001). Significant Group × Time interactions were found for Cobb angle ( F = 8.93, P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.214) and CPEI ( F = 12.56, P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.287), surviving Bonferroni correction. Conclusion This study is the first to report the short-term effects of balanced jar therapy combined with the FCAT for AIS. The combined therapy was associated with significant improvement in several scoliosis indices, plantar pressure, and mental health, suggesting potential clinical benefit. However, clinical translation of this treatment modality needs to be optimized and validated in long-term studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1716190
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical study on the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by balanced jar therapy with flexible corrective appropriate technology

Hui Li, Ye Feng, Yongqi Xie, Haifeng Zhu et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Clinical study on the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by balanced jar therapy with flexible corrective appropriate technology

Hui Li, Ye Feng, Yongqi Xie, Haifeng Zhu, Fen He, Lilei He, Zhijun Wang, Changqing Ye
article en

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of balanced jar therapy combined with the Flexible Corrective Appropriate Technology (FCAT) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods This randomized, single-blind study enrolled adolescents with AIS from October 2022 to September 2024. Participants were divided into control and observation groups. The control group received flexible bracing for at least 6 months, while the observation group received an additional 2-week course of balanced cupping therapy-including flash, kneading, pushing, retention, and removal cupping techniques. Primary outcomes, which include the reduction in Cobb angle and apical transverse rotation (ATR), were assessed at 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes, including gait parameters, plantar pressure measures, spinal mobility, adverse events, and quality of life, were also evaluated at the same timepoints. Results The observation group demonstrated significantly greater reduction in Cobb angle (24.16 ± 3.25 vs. 26.98 ± 3.87, P = 0.007) and ATR (10.24 ± 1.66 vs. 11.79 ± 1.83, P = 0.003) at 3 months. The plantar pressure indices, particularly the center of pressure excursion index (CPEI), showed significantly greater improvement in the observation group (8.87 ± 2.17 vs. 10.54 ± 2.21, P = 0.020). Changes in apical vertebral rotation (AVR) ( P = 0.001) and the distance of the apical vertebral translation (AVT) ( P < 0.001) were observed within the observation group, but between-group comparisons showed no statistical significance. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for gait parameters and spinal mobility measurements ( P > 0.05). The combined treatment showed favorable safety (8.00% vs. 14.46%, P = 0.37) and significantly better quality of life outcomes ( P < 0.001). Significant Group × Time interactions were found for Cobb angle ( F = 8.93, P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.214) and CPEI ( F = 12.56, P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.287), surviving Bonferroni correction. Conclusion This study is the first to report the short-term effects of balanced jar therapy combined with the FCAT for AIS. The combined therapy was associated with significant improvement in several scoliosis indices, plantar pressure, and mental health, suggesting potential clinical benefit. However, clinical translation of this treatment modality needs to be optimized and validated in long-term studies.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Foshan Hospital of TCM (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.