Estimating colony strength and pollination efficiency in honey bees using a novel dataset and deep learning-based models

• Non-invasive deep learning system monitors honey bee colonies in real time • Public dataset of 79,212 annotated bees across diverse real-world conditions • YOLOv10 and FrCNN achieved >93% accuracy for bee caste and pollen detection • Models robust to weather, lighting, and hive variability, unlike prior methods • Cost-effective system enables practical pollination and colony strength monitoring This research introduces a deep learning-based computer vision system for automated honey bee identification and categorization at hive entrances to estimate different castes. The presence of pollen foragers at hive entrances is used to estimate colony health, colony strength and pollination efficiency. However, no study has created a tool for monitoring completely unmodified hives in real-world conditions. The system was trained and evaluated on video frames captured over two years via GoPro cameras, which encompasses various lighting and weather conditions. Bees were annotated to three categories: 1. Worker bee – No pollen, 2. Worker bee – pollen and 3. Drone bee. Five object detection models were compared: YOLOv10, FrCNN, RetinaNet, FCOS, and SSD. While YOLOv10 (93.9% accuracy, 0.92 F1), FrCNN (93.4%, 0.91), FCOS (92.3%, 0.88), and RetinaNet (91.8%, 0.9) achieved excellent results, SSD (54.2%, 0.69) showed average performance. Best mAP scores were achieved with FrCNN and Friedman's test statistically confirmed a significant difference in model performances (Friedman’s statistics = 20.6667, p < 0.001). The proposed system provides a noninvasive, easy-to-use, and cost-effective method for monitoring honey bee behavior by providing valuable data for beekeepers and researchers. The study also contributes to a publicly available dataset of 4,590 frames with 79,212 bee annotations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2026.102005
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating colony strength and pollination efficiency in honey bees using a novel dataset and deep learning-based models

Sathishkumar Samiappan, Volkan Senyurek, C. Michael Foley, Priyadarshini Chakrabarti et al.
Smart Agricultural Technology
Insect and Pesticide Research
article

Estimating colony strength and pollination efficiency in honey bees using a novel dataset and deep learning-based models

Sathishkumar Samiappan, Volkan Senyurek, C. Michael Foley, Priyadarshini Chakrabarti, Leon Kohler, Piyush Chaudhary, Dawson Boes
article en

Abstract

• Non-invasive deep learning system monitors honey bee colonies in real time • Public dataset of 79,212 annotated bees across diverse real-world conditions • YOLOv10 and FrCNN achieved >93% accuracy for bee caste and pollen detection • Models robust to weather, lighting, and hive variability, unlike prior methods • Cost-effective system enables practical pollination and colony strength monitoring This research introduces a deep learning-based computer vision system for automated honey bee identification and categorization at hive entrances to estimate different castes. The presence of pollen foragers at hive entrances is used to estimate colony health, colony strength and pollination efficiency. However, no study has created a tool for monitoring completely unmodified hives in real-world conditions. The system was trained and evaluated on video frames captured over two years via GoPro cameras, which encompasses various lighting and weather conditions. Bees were annotated to three categories: 1. Worker bee – No pollen, 2. Worker bee – pollen and 3. Drone bee. Five object detection models were compared: YOLOv10, FrCNN, RetinaNet, FCOS, and SSD. While YOLOv10 (93.9% accuracy, 0.92 F1), FrCNN (93.4%, 0.91), FCOS (92.3%, 0.88), and RetinaNet (91.8%, 0.9) achieved excellent results, SSD (54.2%, 0.69) showed average performance. Best mAP scores were achieved with FrCNN and Friedman's test statistically confirmed a significant difference in model performances (Friedman’s statistics = 20.6667, p < 0.001). The proposed system provides a noninvasive, easy-to-use, and cost-effective method for monitoring honey bee behavior by providing valuable data for beekeepers and researchers. The study also contributes to a publicly available dataset of 4,590 frames with 79,212 bee annotations.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 14
University of Arkansas System (US), Washington State University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), Mississippi State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Insect and Pesticide Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.