Discriminative Performance and Clinical utility of COPD Exacerbation Categories for Predicting Future Exacerbations

Abstract Rationale Treatment initiation or intensification to prevent exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on the identification of patients with high exacerbation risk. The commonly used high-risk category of at least 2 moderate or 1 severe exacerbation within the prior 12 months has limited supporting evidence. Objective To test the discriminative performance and assess the clinical utility of various COPD exacerbation categories for predicting future exacerbations. Methods In the COPDGene and NOVELTY cohorts, for each 1-year and 2-year recall periods, we estimated 6 distinct categories of exacerbation frequencies (based on distinct combinations of the number of moderate and severe events), each ascertained in 3 ways: within 1 year, in each of 2 consecutive years, and over a rolling combined 2-year period. We estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit to evaluate, respectively, the discriminative performance and clinical utility of the resulting 18 categories for predicting the occurrence of two moderate or one severe exacerbation in the next 12 months. Measurements and Main Results In both COPDGene (n = 3,035) and NOVELTY (n = 3,080), the category of any moderate or severe exacerbation in the past two years had the highest AUC (COPDGene: 0.69, 95%CI 0.67–0.71; NOVELTY: 0.87, 95%CI 0.85–0.88) for predicting the outcome. The AUC was significantly higher than that of the current standard of care of ≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe exacerbations in the past year (ΔAUC = 0.03 in COPDGene and 0.12 in NOVELTY; both P < .001). In net benefit analysis, exacerbation patterns defined over rolling two-year windows provided the highest net benefit across a clinically relevant treatment threshold range of 5% to 30%. Conclusions At least 1 moderate or 1 severe exacerbation over the previous 2 years has the highest discrimination and confers the highest clinical utility for predicting high COPD exacerbation risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag118
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discriminative Performance and Clinical utility of COPD Exacerbation Categories for Predicting Future Exacerbations

P Burgel, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Enrico Maiorino, Amin Adibi et al.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Discriminative Performance and Clinical utility of COPD Exacerbation Categories for Predicting Future Exacerbations

P Burgel, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Enrico Maiorino, Amin Adibi, R.P. Bowler, E.K. Silverman, S P Bhatt, Craig P Hersh, Sandeep Bodduluri, Peter J Castaldi, Christer Janson, Arie Nakhmani, Elizabeth C Oelsner, Carla G Wilson, Hana Mullerova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Treatment initiation or intensification to prevent exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on the identification of patients with high exacerbation risk. The commonly used high-risk category of at least 2 moderate or 1 severe exacerbation within the prior 12 months has limited supporting evidence. Objective To test the discriminative performance and assess the clinical utility of various COPD exacerbation categories for predicting future exacerbations. Methods In the COPDGene and NOVELTY cohorts, for each 1-year and 2-year recall periods, we estimated 6 distinct categories of exacerbation frequencies (based on distinct combinations of the number of moderate and severe events), each ascertained in 3 ways: within 1 year, in each of 2 consecutive years, and over a rolling combined 2-year period. We estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit to evaluate, respectively, the discriminative performance and clinical utility of the resulting 18 categories for predicting the occurrence of two moderate or one severe exacerbation in the next 12 months. Measurements and Main Results In both COPDGene (n = 3,035) and NOVELTY (n = 3,080), the category of any moderate or severe exacerbation in the past two years had the highest AUC (COPDGene: 0.69, 95%CI 0.67–0.71; NOVELTY: 0.87, 95%CI 0.85–0.88) for predicting the outcome. The AUC was significantly higher than that of the current standard of care of ≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe exacerbations in the past year (ΔAUC = 0.03 in COPDGene and 0.12 in NOVELTY; both P < .001). In net benefit analysis, exacerbation patterns defined over rolling two-year windows provided the highest net benefit across a clinically relevant treatment threshold range of 5% to 30%. Conclusions At least 1 moderate or 1 severe exacerbation over the previous 2 years has the highest discrimination and confers the highest clinical utility for predicting high COPD exacerbation risk.

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), National Jewish Health (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), Hôpital Cochin (FR), Department of Medical Sciences (RU), AstraZeneca (Switzerland) (CH), Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes (CA), AstraZeneca (Italy) (IT), Institut Cochin (FR), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.