Legal and ethical implications of electronic monitoring in the supervision of low-risk probationers: Insights from South African legal practitioners

The study explored the perceptions of South African legal practitioners (i.e., magistrates and attorneys) on the legal and ethical implications regarding the use of electronic monitoring in the supervision of low-risk probationers. Drawing from telephonic interviews with the participants (n = 18), it was determined that they consider a sentence of probation with electronic monitoring as a less intrusive alternative to incarceration. Privacy and data protection were seen as less severe than the limitations imposed by imprisonment. Moreover, electronic monitoring was considered broadly consistent with Section 36 of the South African Constitution. However, the participants raised the potential stigmatising nature of electronic monitoring and the expansion of penal surveillance on those who would have otherwise completed their sentence and involvement in the criminal justice system without electronic monitoring. The implications of the study highlight the need for legislative reforms, including alignment with the Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act 4 of 2013, to uphold the constitutional rights of offenders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Probation Journal
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505261428437
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal and ethical implications of electronic monitoring in the supervision of low-risk probationers: Insights from South African legal practitioners

Karen Booyens, Nonhle Tracey Sibisi
Probation Journal
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Legal and ethical implications of electronic monitoring in the supervision of low-risk probationers: Insights from South African legal practitioners

Karen Booyens, Nonhle Tracey Sibisi
article en

Abstract

The study explored the perceptions of South African legal practitioners (i.e., magistrates and attorneys) on the legal and ethical implications regarding the use of electronic monitoring in the supervision of low-risk probationers. Drawing from telephonic interviews with the participants (n = 18), it was determined that they consider a sentence of probation with electronic monitoring as a less intrusive alternative to incarceration. Privacy and data protection were seen as less severe than the limitations imposed by imprisonment. Moreover, electronic monitoring was considered broadly consistent with Section 36 of the South African Constitution. However, the participants raised the potential stigmatising nature of electronic monitoring and the expansion of penal surveillance on those who would have otherwise completed their sentence and involvement in the criminal justice system without electronic monitoring. The implications of the study highlight the need for legislative reforms, including alignment with the Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act 4 of 2013, to uphold the constitutional rights of offenders.

Probation Journal
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.