Interpreting Interaction Patterns and Cognitive Strategies in LLM-Supported Exploratory Learning: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using the DOK Framework

As exploratory learning (EL) is increasingly observed with the use of large language models (LLMs), students demonstrate notably varied levels of engagement and effectiveness when they interact with such LLM-supported learning environments. However, the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities, particularly in how students interact with LLMs, remain underexplored. To address this gap, this observational comparative study systematically investigates the EL strategies of 46 students in two different regions of Asia, classifying 25 distinct strategies across cognitive stages using the Depth of Knowledge model. Our analysis compares strategy usage between high and low-performing student subgroups. The findings reveal: (1) A declining trend in the utilization of EL strategies across ascending cognitive stages. (2) High AWP students employed EL strategies more frequently than their peers, with ten EL strategies exhibiting significant between-group differences. (3) Among students with different AI experience, only a few EL strategies usage and cognitive stages showed significant differences. These insights can help educators and LLM interface designers develop targeted exploratory learning assistance for different types of students and help them build high-level metacognitive processes for effective human–computer interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17030288
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting Interaction Patterns and Cognitive Strategies in LLM-Supported Exploratory Learning: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using the DOK Framework

George Buchanan, Dana McKay, Patrick Cheong‐Iao Pang, Yiming Luo et al.
Information
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Interpreting Interaction Patterns and Cognitive Strategies in LLM-Supported Exploratory Learning: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using the DOK Framework

George Buchanan, Dana McKay, Patrick Cheong‐Iao Pang, Yiming Luo, T. Liu, Shanton Chang
article en

Abstract

As exploratory learning (EL) is increasingly observed with the use of large language models (LLMs), students demonstrate notably varied levels of engagement and effectiveness when they interact with such LLM-supported learning environments. However, the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities, particularly in how students interact with LLMs, remain underexplored. To address this gap, this observational comparative study systematically investigates the EL strategies of 46 students in two different regions of Asia, classifying 25 distinct strategies across cognitive stages using the Depth of Knowledge model. Our analysis compares strategy usage between high and low-performing student subgroups. The findings reveal: (1) A declining trend in the utilization of EL strategies across ascending cognitive stages. (2) High AWP students employed EL strategies more frequently than their peers, with ten EL strategies exhibiting significant between-group differences. (3) Among students with different AI experience, only a few EL strategies usage and cognitive stages showed significant differences. These insights can help educators and LLM interface designers develop targeted exploratory learning assistance for different types of students and help them build high-level metacognitive processes for effective human–computer interaction.

InformationVol. 17(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Macao Polytechnic University (MO), RMIT University (AU)
Hong Kong Baptist University, Beijing Normal University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.