Studying with GenAI: Student views on the opportunities and risks of GenAI in higher education

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technology and the increasing sophistication of such tools have raised concerns about their impact on teaching, learning, and assessment in higher education. To gain an understanding of how students are using GenAI tools for studying and assessments, and to explore their perceptions of its benefits and challenges in higher education, this qualitative study examined the views of Psychology students from two UK universities. Six focus groups (N = 28), consisting of postgraduate psychology students and a few UG students were conducted using semi-structured interview questions to explore their experiences and attitudes toward the use of GenAI during their studies. Students reported using GenAI to summarise content, clarify complex ideas, and ease the writing process. While they recognised its value, especially for accessibility and time management, they also expressed concerns about plagiarism, reduced critical thinking, and unclear boundaries of ethical use. Many felt anxious about academic integrity due to inconsistent guidance. Notably, some students viewed AI use as ethically problematic, particularly in group work. The findings underscore the urgent need for clearer institutional policies and targeted training to promote ethical, effective engagement with GenAI in academic contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13923-3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying with GenAI: Student views on the opportunities and risks of GenAI in higher education

Education and Information Technologies
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Studying with GenAI: Student views on the opportunities and risks of GenAI in higher education

article en

Abstract

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technology and the increasing sophistication of such tools have raised concerns about their impact on teaching, learning, and assessment in higher education. To gain an understanding of how students are using GenAI tools for studying and assessments, and to explore their perceptions of its benefits and challenges in higher education, this qualitative study examined the views of Psychology students from two UK universities. Six focus groups (N = 28), consisting of postgraduate psychology students and a few UG students were conducted using semi-structured interview questions to explore their experiences and attitudes toward the use of GenAI during their studies. Students reported using GenAI to summarise content, clarify complex ideas, and ease the writing process. While they recognised its value, especially for accessibility and time management, they also expressed concerns about plagiarism, reduced critical thinking, and unclear boundaries of ethical use. Many felt anxious about academic integrity due to inconsistent guidance. Notably, some students viewed AI use as ethically problematic, particularly in group work. The findings underscore the urgent need for clearer institutional policies and targeted training to promote ethical, effective engagement with GenAI in academic contexts.

Education and Information Technologies
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
University of Glasgow
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.