Interest Groups and Legislators’ Strategic Rhetoric Towards China During the Ratification of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) in Latin America

This article analyses the speeches of legislators and the interventions of interest groups during the ratification procedures of the Free Trade Agreements signed by Chile, Costa Rica, and Ecuador with China. Our descriptive results suggest a focus on economic issues at the expense of human rights and democracy. Additionally, the rhetorical strategies employed by both lobbies and politicians reinforce the idea of non-alignment or strategic autonomy in the context of bilateral relations with China. Finally, legislators in the three countries are slightly more likely to adopt protectionist stances than lobbies. Overall, it appears that politicians and lobbies in Latin America adopt a pragmatic approach to fostering economic cooperation with China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026261432673
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interest Groups and Legislators’ Strategic Rhetoric Towards China During the Ratification of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) in Latin America

Andrés Dockendorff, Andrés Bórquez, Dorotea López Giral
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
World Trade Organization Law
article

Interest Groups and Legislators’ Strategic Rhetoric Towards China During the Ratification of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) in Latin America

Andrés Dockendorff, Andrés Bórquez, Dorotea López Giral
article en

Abstract

This article analyses the speeches of legislators and the interventions of interest groups during the ratification procedures of the Free Trade Agreements signed by Chile, Costa Rica, and Ecuador with China. Our descriptive results suggest a focus on economic issues at the expense of human rights and democracy. Additionally, the rhetorical strategies employed by both lobbies and politicians reinforce the idea of non-alignment or strategic autonomy in the context of bilateral relations with China. Finally, legislators in the three countries are slightly more likely to adopt protectionist stances than lobbies. Overall, it appears that politicians and lobbies in Latin America adopt a pragmatic approach to fostering economic cooperation with China.

Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
University of Chile (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.