A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Competitive State Anxiety and Stress in Athletes

The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the relationship between competitive state anxiety and stress in athletes through a meta-analysis. A total of 13 studies published domestically between 2000 and August 2025 were selected for analysis. Data were processed using Jamovi 2.7 and JASP 0.95.0.0 to calculate overall effect sizes, heterogeneity, and publication bias. First, the overall mean effect size for competitive state anxiety and stress in athletes was found to be medium (ES=.269). Second, regarding the effect sizes of competitive state anxiety sub-factors on stress, somatic anxiety showed the largest effect (ES=.539), followed by state self-confidence (ES=.288) and cognitive anxiety (ES=.080). Comprehensive analysis suggests that in competitive situations, the interaction between competitive state anxiety and stress may lead to heightened stress levels, potentially causing psychological losses such as performance decline and reduced confidence. Therefore, it is crucial for athletes to manage or alleviate anxiety through continuous and consistent simulation training to prevent anxiety during competitions. Furthermore, coaches should design training programs tailored to individual athletes to help relieve competitive state anxiety. In conclusion, this study holds academic significance by systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing competitive state anxiety and stress in athletes. Moreover, it can serve as foundational data for alleviating negative psychological factors among athletes in practical settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Sports Science
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2026.2.35.1.159
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Competitive State Anxiety and Stress in Athletes

Chan-Su Park, Chae-Ho Park
Korean Journal of Sports Science
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Competitive State Anxiety and Stress in Athletes

Chan-Su Park, Chae-Ho Park
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the relationship between competitive state anxiety and stress in athletes through a meta-analysis. A total of 13 studies published domestically between 2000 and August 2025 were selected for analysis. Data were processed using Jamovi 2.7 and JASP 0.95.0.0 to calculate overall effect sizes, heterogeneity, and publication bias. First, the overall mean effect size for competitive state anxiety and stress in athletes was found to be medium (ES=.269). Second, regarding the effect sizes of competitive state anxiety sub-factors on stress, somatic anxiety showed the largest effect (ES=.539), followed by state self-confidence (ES=.288) and cognitive anxiety (ES=.080). Comprehensive analysis suggests that in competitive situations, the interaction between competitive state anxiety and stress may lead to heightened stress levels, potentially causing psychological losses such as performance decline and reduced confidence. Therefore, it is crucial for athletes to manage or alleviate anxiety through continuous and consistent simulation training to prevent anxiety during competitions. Furthermore, coaches should design training programs tailored to individual athletes to help relieve competitive state anxiety. In conclusion, this study holds academic significance by systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing competitive state anxiety and stress in athletes. Moreover, it can serve as foundational data for alleviating negative psychological factors among athletes in practical settings.

Korean Journal of Sports ScienceVol. 35(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.