Influence of Input Data Uncertainty on Cellular Automata-Based Wildfire Spread Simulation

Cellular automata-based wildfire simulation models are widely used to support fire management, risk assessment, and operational decision-making, due to their efficiency and computational advantages. However, the accuracy of these models heavily depends on the quality of input data provided by the user, including the composition and geospatial extend of forest fuels, current meteorological conditions and terrain information. This publication examines how quantitative and spatial input data uncertainties affect the estimates of the impacted areas. Using a series of simulation experiments, inaccurate data are introduced to specific input variables (such as the vegetation type and the fuel moisture content) to reflect realistic levels of uncertainty commonly observed in operational scenarios, where users with different cognitive backgrounds fail to properly identify key characteristics of a fire. Model outputs are then compared using spatial and temporal performance metrics, including the rate of spread and burned area extent. The results demonstrate that uncertainties in fuel models and meteorological inputs exert a dominant influence on simulated fire behavior. Our findings highlight the sensitivity of wildfire simulations to compounded input uncertainties and stress the need for improved in-field data acquisition strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17030289
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Input Data Uncertainty on Cellular Automata-Based Wildfire Spread Simulation

George Xylomenos, Ioannis Karakonstantis
Information
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Influence of Input Data Uncertainty on Cellular Automata-Based Wildfire Spread Simulation

George Xylomenos, Ioannis Karakonstantis
article en

Abstract

Cellular automata-based wildfire simulation models are widely used to support fire management, risk assessment, and operational decision-making, due to their efficiency and computational advantages. However, the accuracy of these models heavily depends on the quality of input data provided by the user, including the composition and geospatial extend of forest fuels, current meteorological conditions and terrain information. This publication examines how quantitative and spatial input data uncertainties affect the estimates of the impacted areas. Using a series of simulation experiments, inaccurate data are introduced to specific input variables (such as the vegetation type and the fuel moisture content) to reflect realistic levels of uncertainty commonly observed in operational scenarios, where users with different cognitive backgrounds fail to properly identify key characteristics of a fire. Model outputs are then compared using spatial and temporal performance metrics, including the rate of spread and burned area extent. The results demonstrate that uncertainties in fuel models and meteorological inputs exert a dominant influence on simulated fire behavior. Our findings highlight the sensitivity of wildfire simulations to compounded input uncertainties and stress the need for improved in-field data acquisition strategies.

InformationVol. 17(3)
Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.