Sample size calculations for pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial: a review 2010–2020

Average sample sizes for cRCTs have remained strikingly constant over the period 2010-2020 and across several key features of studies; they do not appear to be meaningfully impacted by the stated study aims or sample size justifications. This is despite the fact that the reported main aims for pilot cRCTs, and justifications for their sample sizes, do appear to have changed during this time. Given that aims and justifications appear to have changed, but typical sample sizes have not, it is possible that some researchers choose sample size for pilot cRCTs primarily out of convenience or practical reasons, whilst stating other justifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01792-z
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sample size calculations for pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial: a review 2010–2020

D. Green, Peter J. Dodd, Rebecca Simpson, Stephen J. Walters et al.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Sample size calculations for pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial: a review 2010–2020

D. Green, Peter J. Dodd, Rebecca Simpson, Stephen J. Walters, Ines Rombach, Lauren Desoysa, M. Campbell, Jen Lewis, Steven Julious, Bright C. Offorha
article en

Abstract

Average sample sizes for cRCTs have remained strikingly constant over the period 2010-2020 and across several key features of studies; they do not appear to be meaningfully impacted by the stated study aims or sample size justifications. This is despite the fact that the reported main aims for pilot cRCTs, and justifications for their sample sizes, do appear to have changed during this time. Given that aims and justifications appear to have changed, but typical sample sizes have not, it is possible that some researchers choose sample size for pilot cRCTs primarily out of convenience or practical reasons, whilst stating other justifications.

Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Aston University (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.