PERISCOPING POLITICAL PATRONAGE AND DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRACY IN ANAMBRA STATE

The study examined the relationship between political patronage and development of democracy in Anambra State. The specific objectives of the study are; to examine the effect of patronage-based political appointments on political accountability in Anambra State, ascertain the effect of the distribution of government contracts to political allies on citizens’ political participation in Anambra State, and to explore the effect of patronage-driven allocation of public resources on public trust in democratic institutions in Anambra State. In line with these objectives, three research questions and corresponding hypotheses were formulated to guide the study. The study was hinged on the Elite Theory which was first systematically articulated by Gaetano Mosca (1939) and later developed by Vilfredo Pareto (1968) and C. Wright Mills (1956). A descriptive survey research design was adopted, with a population of three hundred and twenty-eight (328) selected residents of Anambra State who were considered knowledgeable about political activities and governance in the state. Data were collected from both primary and secondary sources, with a structured questionnaire serving as the primary instrument for data collection. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency counts and mean scores, while the Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r) techniques, through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26 was used to test the hypotheses. The findings revealed that; patronage-based political appointments have significant negative effect on political accountability in Anambra State; the distribution of government contracts to political allies has significant negative effect on citizens’ political participation in Anambra State, and that patronage-driven allocation of public resources has significant negative effect on public trust in democratic institutions in Anambra State. Based on the findings, the study concluded that political patronage negatively impacts the development of democracy in Anambra State. It recommends among other things that government and political stakeholders should adopt transparent and merit-based appointment processes for public offices to strengthen political accountability. Ensuring that qualified individuals occupy key positions will enhance oversight, reduce corruption, and promote good governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19050723
Primary Topic
African Education and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERISCOPING POLITICAL PATRONAGE AND DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRACY IN ANAMBRA STATE

Chidiebere S. Nebo, E. Ezenwaji Emma, Promise Onyinyechukwu Nri
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
African Education and Politics
article

PERISCOPING POLITICAL PATRONAGE AND DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRACY IN ANAMBRA STATE

Chidiebere S. Nebo, E. Ezenwaji Emma, Promise Onyinyechukwu Nri
article en

Abstract

The study examined the relationship between political patronage and development of democracy in Anambra State. The specific objectives of the study are; to examine the effect of patronage-based political appointments on political accountability in Anambra State, ascertain the effect of the distribution of government contracts to political allies on citizens’ political participation in Anambra State, and to explore the effect of patronage-driven allocation of public resources on public trust in democratic institutions in Anambra State. In line with these objectives, three research questions and corresponding hypotheses were formulated to guide the study. The study was hinged on the Elite Theory which was first systematically articulated by Gaetano Mosca (1939) and later developed by Vilfredo Pareto (1968) and C. Wright Mills (1956). A descriptive survey research design was adopted, with a population of three hundred and twenty-eight (328) selected residents of Anambra State who were considered knowledgeable about political activities and governance in the state. Data were collected from both primary and secondary sources, with a structured questionnaire serving as the primary instrument for data collection. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency counts and mean scores, while the Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r) techniques, through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26 was used to test the hypotheses. The findings revealed that; patronage-based political appointments have significant negative effect on political accountability in Anambra State; the distribution of government contracts to political allies has significant negative effect on citizens’ political participation in Anambra State, and that patronage-driven allocation of public resources has significant negative effect on public trust in democratic institutions in Anambra State. Based on the findings, the study concluded that political patronage negatively impacts the development of democracy in Anambra State. It recommends among other things that government and political stakeholders should adopt transparent and merit-based appointment processes for public offices to strengthen political accountability. Ensuring that qualified individuals occupy key positions will enhance oversight, reduce corruption, and promote good governance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
African Education and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.