The use of price risk management tools by cattle producers

Purpose United States (US) cattle producers have tools to manage price risk, such as options contracts, futures contracts and livestock risk protection (LRP) insurance. However, there has been limited use of price risk management tools among beef cattle producers. The purpose of this research is to determine factors associated with the use of options contracts, futures contracts and LRP insurance. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a survey of US cattle producers about their use of LRP insurance, futures contracts and options to manage price risk. A multivariate probit model was estimated to understand what drives the likelihood of these price risk management tools. Findings We find most producers have never used any price risk management tools, but LRP was the most used (12.5%), followed by futures contracts (6%) and option contracts (5.5%). Producer age, herd size, risk preferences, perceived effectiveness at managing price risk and other factors affected the use of these tools. Interestingly, high risk tolerance results in an increased likelihood of using futures contracts, which is opposite to what was anticipated. Originality/value Findings inform industry stakeholders, educators and policymakers in developing effective educational programs for producers regarding price risk management. This article also broadens the body of knowledge on the acceptance of various price risk management among cattle producers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Finance Review
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/afr-11-2024-0179
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The use of price risk management tools by cattle producers

Charles C. Martinez, Christopher N. Boyer, Karen L. DeLong, Sourav Barua et al.
Agricultural Finance Review
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

The use of price risk management tools by cattle producers

Charles C. Martinez, Christopher N. Boyer, Karen L. DeLong, Sourav Barua, Andrew P. Griffith
article en

Abstract

Purpose United States (US) cattle producers have tools to manage price risk, such as options contracts, futures contracts and livestock risk protection (LRP) insurance. However, there has been limited use of price risk management tools among beef cattle producers. The purpose of this research is to determine factors associated with the use of options contracts, futures contracts and LRP insurance. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a survey of US cattle producers about their use of LRP insurance, futures contracts and options to manage price risk. A multivariate probit model was estimated to understand what drives the likelihood of these price risk management tools. Findings We find most producers have never used any price risk management tools, but LRP was the most used (12.5%), followed by futures contracts (6%) and option contracts (5.5%). Producer age, herd size, risk preferences, perceived effectiveness at managing price risk and other factors affected the use of these tools. Interestingly, high risk tolerance results in an increased likelihood of using futures contracts, which is opposite to what was anticipated. Originality/value Findings inform industry stakeholders, educators and policymakers in developing effective educational programs for producers regarding price risk management. This article also broadens the body of knowledge on the acceptance of various price risk management among cattle producers.

Agricultural Finance Review
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.