Manual Dexterity Shows Greater Discretionary Value than Sensor-Based Gait and Balance Measures in Identifying Early Functional Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis

<b>Objective</b>: To determine which physical clinical test best differentiates minimally impaired people with MS (pwMS) from healthy controls and to compare the discriminatory value of upper limb clinical assessments with sensor-based gait and postural control measures. <b>Methods</b>: Forty-one participants (21 pwMS, 20 matched healthy controls) completed a single testing session including upper limb clinical assessments (Nine-Hole Peg Test [9HPT], grip strength), gait (Timed 25-Foot Walk, Six-Minute Walk Test, and cognitive-walking dual task), and static balance assessments using wearable inertial sensors (APDM Mobility Lab system). Dual-task costs (DTCs) were calculated for gait parameters. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent <i>t</i>-tests. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to examine interrelationships among gait variables, and a parsimonious binary logistic regression model was constructed, including non-dominant 9HPT and dual-task walking speed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to evaluate discriminative performance and determine the optimal 9HPT cutoff. <b>Results</b>: PwMS performed significantly slower on the 9HPT for both hands (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.006) and demonstrated reduced walking performance and higher gait DTCs (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.041) compared with controls. No significant group differences were observed in grip strength or sensor-based postural control. In multivariable analysis, the overall model was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001; Nagelkerke R<sup>2</sup> = 0.49), and the non-dominant 9HPT remained the only independent predictor of group status (OR = 1.75, 95% CI [1.17-2.61]), whereas dual-task walking speed was not significant after adjustment. ROC analysis demonstrated good discriminative ability for the non-dominant 9HPT (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI [0.71-0.97]) and acceptable discrimination for dual-task walking speed (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI [0.60-0.90]). The optimal 9HPT cutoff was ≥21.4 s, yielding 71% sensitivity and 100% specificity in this cohort. <b>Conclusions</b>: Manual dexterity of the non-dominant hand may serve as a sensitive screening marker of early functional impairment in MS, demonstrating greater discriminatory value than sensor-based gait and balance measures. These findings support the inclusion of upper limb dexterity testing in the routine assessment of minimally impaired pwMS. Validation in larger, longitudinal cohorts is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061866
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manual Dexterity Shows Greater Discretionary Value than Sensor-Based Gait and Balance Measures in Identifying Early Functional Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis

Alon Kalron, Mousa Hujirat
Sensors
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Manual Dexterity Shows Greater Discretionary Value than Sensor-Based Gait and Balance Measures in Identifying Early Functional Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis

Alon Kalron, Mousa Hujirat
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: To determine which physical clinical test best differentiates minimally impaired people with MS (pwMS) from healthy controls and to compare the discriminatory value of upper limb clinical assessments with sensor-based gait and postural control measures. <b>Methods</b>: Forty-one participants (21 pwMS, 20 matched healthy controls) completed a single testing session including upper limb clinical assessments (Nine-Hole Peg Test [9HPT], grip strength), gait (Timed 25-Foot Walk, Six-Minute Walk Test, and cognitive-walking dual task), and static balance assessments using wearable inertial sensors (APDM Mobility Lab system). Dual-task costs (DTCs) were calculated for gait parameters. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent <i>t</i>-tests. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to examine interrelationships among gait variables, and a parsimonious binary logistic regression model was constructed, including non-dominant 9HPT and dual-task walking speed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to evaluate discriminative performance and determine the optimal 9HPT cutoff. <b>Results</b>: PwMS performed significantly slower on the 9HPT for both hands (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.006) and demonstrated reduced walking performance and higher gait DTCs (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.041) compared with controls. No significant group differences were observed in grip strength or sensor-based postural control. In multivariable analysis, the overall model was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001; Nagelkerke R<sup>2</sup> = 0.49), and the non-dominant 9HPT remained the only independent predictor of group status (OR = 1.75, 95% CI [1.17-2.61]), whereas dual-task walking speed was not significant after adjustment. ROC analysis demonstrated good discriminative ability for the non-dominant 9HPT (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI [0.71-0.97]) and acceptable discrimination for dual-task walking speed (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI [0.60-0.90]). The optimal 9HPT cutoff was ≥21.4 s, yielding 71% sensitivity and 100% specificity in this cohort. <b>Conclusions</b>: Manual dexterity of the non-dominant hand may serve as a sensitive screening marker of early functional impairment in MS, demonstrating greater discriminatory value than sensor-based gait and balance measures. These findings support the inclusion of upper limb dexterity testing in the routine assessment of minimally impaired pwMS. Validation in larger, longitudinal cohorts is warranted.

SensorsVol. 26(6)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.