Jurisdiction in Cases of Homeless Children “A Comparative Study between Islamic Jurisprudence and the Saudi Judicial System”

HRMARS - Addressing the issues faced by children living outside traditional family structures requires more than simply applying legal or religious texts; it necessitates a deep understanding of the nature of these situations and an awareness of the responsibility of judicial authorities to protect this vulnerable group. Homelessness is not merely the absence of shelter, but a complex social and legal situation that can lead to direct violations of a child's rights to care and protection. This research examines this phenomenon from two complementary perspectives: the first, derived from Islamic jurisprudence, which includes principles and rulings that uphold the protection of minors and their dignity; and the second, through the Saudi judicial system, which has sought to codify and implement these principles within a modern legal framework. Through this comparative study, the research aims to highlight how both jurisprudence and the legal system address this issue, in terms of concepts, methods, and outcomes. The study discusses the extent to which Islamic jurisprudence and the Saudi legal system converge in recognizing the principle of "the best interests of the child," the state's responsibility, and the judge's authority to take appropriate measures for the child's protection. It also addresses areas of divergence, particularly in judicial structure and procedural rules, compared to the flexibility of jurisprudential approaches based on the objectives of Islamic law (Maqasid Al-Shari'ah). This study seeks to move beyond mere description, analyzing the extent to which the Saudi judicial system has succeeded in providing effective solutions that respect religious principles without neglecting institutional and legal realities. The study concludes with a critical perspective that examines points of convergence and divergence, and suggests areas for development to achieve more comprehensive legal protection that is consistent with religious principles and practical requirements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v16-i3/27720
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jurisdiction in Cases of Homeless Children “A Comparative Study between Islamic Jurisprudence and the Saudi Judicial System”

Hani Alanazi, Abdelrahman Abdelhamid Mohammed Hassanein, Ibrahim Wanni Tohyala
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

Jurisdiction in Cases of Homeless Children “A Comparative Study between Islamic Jurisprudence and the Saudi Judicial System”

Hani Alanazi, Abdelrahman Abdelhamid Mohammed Hassanein, Ibrahim Wanni Tohyala
article en

Abstract

HRMARS - Addressing the issues faced by children living outside traditional family structures requires more than simply applying legal or religious texts; it necessitates a deep understanding of the nature of these situations and an awareness of the responsibility of judicial authorities to protect this vulnerable group. Homelessness is not merely the absence of shelter, but a complex social and legal situation that can lead to direct violations of a child's rights to care and protection. This research examines this phenomenon from two complementary perspectives: the first, derived from Islamic jurisprudence, which includes principles and rulings that uphold the protection of minors and their dignity; and the second, through the Saudi judicial system, which has sought to codify and implement these principles within a modern legal framework. Through this comparative study, the research aims to highlight how both jurisprudence and the legal system address this issue, in terms of concepts, methods, and outcomes. The study discusses the extent to which Islamic jurisprudence and the Saudi legal system converge in recognizing the principle of "the best interests of the child," the state's responsibility, and the judge's authority to take appropriate measures for the child's protection. It also addresses areas of divergence, particularly in judicial structure and procedural rules, compared to the flexibility of jurisprudential approaches based on the objectives of Islamic law (Maqasid Al-Shari'ah). This study seeks to move beyond mere description, analyzing the extent to which the Saudi judicial system has succeeded in providing effective solutions that respect religious principles without neglecting institutional and legal realities. The study concludes with a critical perspective that examines points of convergence and divergence, and suggests areas for development to achieve more comprehensive legal protection that is consistent with religious principles and practical requirements.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 16(3)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.