Interrater reliability and criterion validity of the hand-held three-dimensional scanning method for evaluating hand volume in patients with stroke

Objectives: This study aims to assess the interrater reliability and criterion validity of a three-dimensional (3D) scanning method in evaluating hand volume in patients with stroke. Patients and methods: This observational study was conducted with 20 stroke patients (11 males, 9 females; mean age: 59.5±13.3 years; range, 28 to 74 years) between February 2023 and June 2023. Two trained therapists (Operators A and B) used a hand-held 3D laser scanner to measure bilateral hand volumes sequentially to assess the consistency of measurements between operators. Operator A also used a split cup to measure bilateral hand volumes to assess the accuracy of measurements between 3D scanning and the gold standard water displacement (WD) method. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient between the two operators was 0.923 (p<0.001) for the volume of the non-affected hand measured using the 3D scanning method and 0.945 (p<0.001) for the affected hand. The volume of the non-affected hand measured by Operator A using the 3D scanning method highly correlated with the volume measured by the WD (r=0.938, p<0.001), and the volume of affected hand measured by using the 3D scanning method highly correlated with the volume of that measured by the WD (r=0.927, p<0.001). Conclusion: The 3D scanning method has good interrater reliability and criterion validity in the measurement of hand volume of affected and non-affected hands in patients with stroke.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2026.15938
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interrater reliability and criterion validity of the hand-held three-dimensional scanning method for evaluating hand volume in patients with stroke

Xiao Qiu, Junqi ling, Yulong Bai, Guoliang Zhang et al.
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Interrater reliability and criterion validity of the hand-held three-dimensional scanning method for evaluating hand volume in patients with stroke

Xiao Qiu, Junqi ling, Yulong Bai, Guoliang Zhang, Yangyang Cong, Xia Zhao
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess the interrater reliability and criterion validity of a three-dimensional (3D) scanning method in evaluating hand volume in patients with stroke. Patients and methods: This observational study was conducted with 20 stroke patients (11 males, 9 females; mean age: 59.5±13.3 years; range, 28 to 74 years) between February 2023 and June 2023. Two trained therapists (Operators A and B) used a hand-held 3D laser scanner to measure bilateral hand volumes sequentially to assess the consistency of measurements between operators. Operator A also used a split cup to measure bilateral hand volumes to assess the accuracy of measurements between 3D scanning and the gold standard water displacement (WD) method. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient between the two operators was 0.923 (p<0.001) for the volume of the non-affected hand measured using the 3D scanning method and 0.945 (p<0.001) for the affected hand. The volume of the non-affected hand measured by Operator A using the 3D scanning method highly correlated with the volume measured by the WD (r=0.938, p<0.001), and the volume of affected hand measured by using the 3D scanning method highly correlated with the volume of that measured by the WD (r=0.927, p<0.001). Conclusion: The 3D scanning method has good interrater reliability and criterion validity in the measurement of hand volume of affected and non-affected hands in patients with stroke.

Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 72(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.