A Comparative Flood Forecasting Analysis Using Different Deep Learning Techniques for Baitarani Basin in India

This paper explores different Deep Learning (DL) models for flood forecasting at Baitarani basin in India. Here, three different modeling techniques namely Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), Convolution Neural Network (CNN) and Encoder-Decoder (E-D) have been chosen for flood forecasting. Analysis is performed at two gauging sites of Baitarani basin namely Champua and Anandpur, taking 30 years (1991–2020) data of discharge, rainfall and water level as input. Different statistical indices are used for model evaluation. From the study it was found that CNN model efficiency is more than 91% for a lead time of 1-day and 86% for a lead time of 2day at Champua gauging station but as moving towards downstream gauging site of Anandpur, LSTM is performing better that CNN and E-D model. LSTM model efficiency is more than 88% for a lead time of 1-day and 80% for a lead time of 2-day at Anandpur gauging station.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0097807825601074
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Flood Forecasting Analysis Using Different Deep Learning Techniques for Baitarani Basin in India

A. K. Lohani, Koustav Nath, T. Thomas, Purna C. Nayak et al.
Water Resources
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

A Comparative Flood Forecasting Analysis Using Different Deep Learning Techniques for Baitarani Basin in India

A. K. Lohani, Koustav Nath, T. Thomas, Purna C. Nayak, Meenakshi Ramola
article en

Abstract

This paper explores different Deep Learning (DL) models for flood forecasting at Baitarani basin in India. Here, three different modeling techniques namely Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), Convolution Neural Network (CNN) and Encoder-Decoder (E-D) have been chosen for flood forecasting. Analysis is performed at two gauging sites of Baitarani basin namely Champua and Anandpur, taking 30 years (1991–2020) data of discharge, rainfall and water level as input. Different statistical indices are used for model evaluation. From the study it was found that CNN model efficiency is more than 91% for a lead time of 1-day and 86% for a lead time of 2day at Champua gauging station but as moving towards downstream gauging site of Anandpur, LSTM is performing better that CNN and E-D model. LSTM model efficiency is more than 88% for a lead time of 1-day and 80% for a lead time of 2-day at Anandpur gauging station.

Water ResourcesVol. 53(2)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN), National Institute of Hydrology (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.