Identification and synthesis of decision-making factors in vestibular schwannoma treatment

Managing vestibular schwannomas (VS) involves complex choices among wait-and-scan, stereotactic radiotherapy, and surgery. Although shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly emphasized, the factors reported to influence treatment choices remain incompletely characterized. This systematic review aims to synthesize reported factors influencing treatment decision-making in VS and inform SDM practices. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted on February 24, 2024, across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Twelve studies were included, comprising patient and/or physician surveys and retrospective chart reviews. Extracted data included patient characteristics, tumor features, physician-related factors, and treatment-related considerations. Levels of evidence were classified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine framework. Most studies were level 4–5, reflecting a predominantly observational and descriptive evidence base. Tumor size, hearing status, and patient age were frequently reported in association with treatment selection. Psychological factors, including anxiety, reassurance-seeking, and quality-of-life considerations were commonly described in relation to decision-making. Physician factors, such as specialty and communication style, were also reported as relevant. Several studies noted higher satisfaction when patients described active involvement in decision-making and multidisciplinary input. Decision-making in VS management is multifactorial and highly individualized. Greater emphasis on transparent communication and structured SDM tools may help align treatment decisions with patient preferences. These findings highlight the need for future research focusing on standardized decision aids and the integration of patient-reported outcomes into longitudinal care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10104-3
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification and synthesis of decision-making factors in vestibular schwannoma treatment

Steven W. Mes, Elke Loos, S. De Vleeschouwer, J. F. Daisne et al.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

Identification and synthesis of decision-making factors in vestibular schwannoma treatment

Steven W. Mes, Elke Loos, S. De Vleeschouwer, J. F. Daisne, Daniele Borsetto, Nicolas Verhaert, Lien Segers
article en

Abstract

Managing vestibular schwannomas (VS) involves complex choices among wait-and-scan, stereotactic radiotherapy, and surgery. Although shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly emphasized, the factors reported to influence treatment choices remain incompletely characterized. This systematic review aims to synthesize reported factors influencing treatment decision-making in VS and inform SDM practices. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted on February 24, 2024, across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Twelve studies were included, comprising patient and/or physician surveys and retrospective chart reviews. Extracted data included patient characteristics, tumor features, physician-related factors, and treatment-related considerations. Levels of evidence were classified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine framework. Most studies were level 4–5, reflecting a predominantly observational and descriptive evidence base. Tumor size, hearing status, and patient age were frequently reported in association with treatment selection. Psychological factors, including anxiety, reassurance-seeking, and quality-of-life considerations were commonly described in relation to decision-making. Physician factors, such as specialty and communication style, were also reported as relevant. Several studies noted higher satisfaction when patients described active involvement in decision-making and multidisciplinary input. Decision-making in VS management is multifactorial and highly individualized. Greater emphasis on transparent communication and structured SDM tools may help align treatment decisions with patient preferences. These findings highlight the need for future research focusing on standardized decision aids and the integration of patient-reported outcomes into longitudinal care.

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), Erasmus MC (NL), North American Skull Base Society (US), Iridium Kankernetwerk (BE), Neuroelectronics Research Flanders (BE), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), UCLouvain (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.