Measuring Digital Stress in Children: Construct Validity, Model Comparisons, and Measurement Invariance of a Multidimensional Scale (DSS-CH)

<b>Background:</b> The use of digital media in childhood offers both opportunities and risks. Digital stressors-such as excessive screen time, constant availability, information overload, and social media pressures-affect primary school children but have been rarely studied systematically. Despite growing research, no validated instruments adequately capture how younger children perceive and express digital stress. This study presents the development and validation of a three-dimensional instrument for children under 14: the "Digital Stress in Children" scale (DSS-CH). The DSS-CH is theory-driven and child-appropriate, with three interrelated but distinct dimensions: (1) excessive screen time, (2) compulsive media behavior, and (3) approval anxiety. <b>Methods:</b> In a cross-sectional survey of <i>n</i> = 907 Swiss primary school children (grades 5-6; ages 10-14), participants completed an online questionnaire in class. Latent variable modeling with cluster-robust inference accounted for classroom nesting. Competing models (1-, 2-, 3-factor CFA; ESEM; bifactor-ESEM) were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> The 1-factor CFA fit poorly (CFI ≈ 0.81; RMSEA ≈ 0.15), while the 3-factor CFA showed acceptable fit (CFI ≈ 0.96; RMSEA ≈ 0.07). Allowing cross-loadings improved fit substantially in the 3-factor ESEM and bifactor-ESEM (CFI ≈ 0.999; RMSEA ≈ 0.01), supporting a general digital stress factor alongside facet-specific variance. Subscales showed good reliability (ordinal α ≈ 0.81 - 0.89) and moderate intercorrelations (r ≈ 0.28 - 0.47). Scalar invariance across gender and age was supported (ΔCFI ≤ 0.003; ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.012). <b>Conclusions:</b> The DSS-CH demonstrates good reliability, model fit, and measurement invariance. It provides valid evidence for interpreting children's digital stress as three related facets and can help identify elevated stress profiles to inform preventive efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13030405
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Digital Stress in Children: Construct Validity, Model Comparisons, and Measurement Invariance of a Multidimensional Scale (DSS-CH)

Felix Kruse, Arvid Nagel
Children
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Measuring Digital Stress in Children: Construct Validity, Model Comparisons, and Measurement Invariance of a Multidimensional Scale (DSS-CH)

Felix Kruse, Arvid Nagel
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The use of digital media in childhood offers both opportunities and risks. Digital stressors-such as excessive screen time, constant availability, information overload, and social media pressures-affect primary school children but have been rarely studied systematically. Despite growing research, no validated instruments adequately capture how younger children perceive and express digital stress. This study presents the development and validation of a three-dimensional instrument for children under 14: the "Digital Stress in Children" scale (DSS-CH). The DSS-CH is theory-driven and child-appropriate, with three interrelated but distinct dimensions: (1) excessive screen time, (2) compulsive media behavior, and (3) approval anxiety. <b>Methods:</b> In a cross-sectional survey of <i>n</i> = 907 Swiss primary school children (grades 5-6; ages 10-14), participants completed an online questionnaire in class. Latent variable modeling with cluster-robust inference accounted for classroom nesting. Competing models (1-, 2-, 3-factor CFA; ESEM; bifactor-ESEM) were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> The 1-factor CFA fit poorly (CFI ≈ 0.81; RMSEA ≈ 0.15), while the 3-factor CFA showed acceptable fit (CFI ≈ 0.96; RMSEA ≈ 0.07). Allowing cross-loadings improved fit substantially in the 3-factor ESEM and bifactor-ESEM (CFI ≈ 0.999; RMSEA ≈ 0.01), supporting a general digital stress factor alongside facet-specific variance. Subscales showed good reliability (ordinal α ≈ 0.81 - 0.89) and moderate intercorrelations (r ≈ 0.28 - 0.47). Scalar invariance across gender and age was supported (ΔCFI ≤ 0.003; ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.012). <b>Conclusions:</b> The DSS-CH demonstrates good reliability, model fit, and measurement invariance. It provides valid evidence for interpreting children's digital stress as three related facets and can help identify elevated stress profiles to inform preventive efforts.

ChildrenVol. 13(3)
University of St.Gallen (CH), St.Gallen University of Teacher Education (CH), Pädagogische Hochschule Bern (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.