Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

When trying to intercept a moving target, one’s movements are continuously adjusted to match the latest information about the target’s position. Many target characteristics influence the latency of such adjustments. Does the kind of movement that is being made also influence this visuomotor latency? Since there are reasons to suspect that it might, we compared the latency of responses to sudden jumps in moving targets’ positions when making two quite different movements to intercept the targets: sliding one’s finger across a screen to pass through the moving targets and lifting one’s finger off the screen to tap on the targets. Twenty-two participants intercepted targets by making both these movements in two separate blocks of trials in counterbalanced order. Despite the substantial differences between the two kinds of movements, the latency of the responses was 114 ms for both. Thus, the visuomotor latency does not depend on the kind of movement that is made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07264-3
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

E Brenner, Jeroen B. J. Smeets, Sem Bom
Experimental Brain Research
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

E Brenner, Jeroen B. J. Smeets, Sem Bom
article en

Abstract

When trying to intercept a moving target, one’s movements are continuously adjusted to match the latest information about the target’s position. Many target characteristics influence the latency of such adjustments. Does the kind of movement that is being made also influence this visuomotor latency? Since there are reasons to suspect that it might, we compared the latency of responses to sudden jumps in moving targets’ positions when making two quite different movements to intercept the targets: sliding one’s finger across a screen to pass through the moving targets and lifting one’s finger off the screen to tap on the targets. Twenty-two participants intercepted targets by making both these movements in two separate blocks of trials in counterbalanced order. Despite the substantial differences between the two kinds of movements, the latency of the responses was 114 ms for both. Thus, the visuomotor latency does not depend on the kind of movement that is made.

Experimental Brain ResearchVol. 244(4)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.