How Do People Maintain Consensual Non-Monogamy? An International Development and Validation of the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale

Maintaining multiple intimate relationships entails some risks and complications beyond exclusive pair bonding (i.e., monogamy). Consensual non-monogamy (CNM; e.g., polyamory, swinging, or open relationships) allegedly reduces these risks and complications, but no one has tried to comprehensively document typical CNM risk management practices, nor analyzed the relationship outcomes of those who use these practices. We developed the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale (MRMS) to examine how engagement in common CNM practices predicts relationship quality among people with one or more partners. In Study 1, a community sample of people with CNM experience (N = 429) nominated the best practices for maintaining CNM. Responses were combined with theory-derived practices to create the MRMS. In Study 2, we administered the MRMS in three international online surveys (N = 4,290) to assess factor structure and construct validity. Factor analysis revealed nine practices: disclosure of one's extra-pair attractions to a partner, open communication about jealousy, compersion, willingness to care for unrelated children, shared extra-pair sexual experiences, partner (non)hierarchy, sexual health maintenance, thoughtful resource distribution among partners, and reputation management. Data from one of the three surveys (n = 871) showed that each practice had distinctive patterns of association with previous CNM experience, relationship and sexual satisfaction, partner investment and interdependence, and self-reported infidelity (i.e., how often extra-pair interactions feel to violate an existing relationship's agreements). We discuss how the MRMS may be used to study how people in CNM relationships maintain multiple intimate relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03334-9
Primary Topic
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do People Maintain Consensual Non-Monogamy? An International Development and Validation of the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale

Laith Al-Shawaf, Daniel J. Kruger, Zsófia Csajbók, Adİl Sarıbay et al.
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
article

How Do People Maintain Consensual Non-Monogamy? An International Development and Validation of the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale

Laith Al-Shawaf, Daniel J. Kruger, Zsófia Csajbók, Adİl Sarıbay, Cory J. Cascalheira, David P. Schmitt, Geoffrey F. Miller, Katarzyna Grunt-Mejer, Stephen Whyte, Cezar Giosan, Limor Y. Gottlieb, Amy C. Moors, Zuzana Štěrbová, Klára Bártová, Ivana Goláňová, Stefano Ciaffoni, Pavol Prokop, Tamas David-Barrett, William Costello, Heath Schechinger, Justin K. Mogilski, Magdalena Lipnicka, Michelle A. Larva, Virgil Zeigler-Hill, David L. Rodrigues, Rhonda Balzarini, Ezra Hampikian, Justin J. Lehmiller, Peter K. Jonason, Elisabeth Sheff, Andrew J. Thomas, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Jaroslava Varella Valentova, David J. Ley, Ryan G. Witherspoon, Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska
article en

Abstract

Maintaining multiple intimate relationships entails some risks and complications beyond exclusive pair bonding (i.e., monogamy). Consensual non-monogamy (CNM; e.g., polyamory, swinging, or open relationships) allegedly reduces these risks and complications, but no one has tried to comprehensively document typical CNM risk management practices, nor analyzed the relationship outcomes of those who use these practices. We developed the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale (MRMS) to examine how engagement in common CNM practices predicts relationship quality among people with one or more partners. In Study 1, a community sample of people with CNM experience (N = 429) nominated the best practices for maintaining CNM. Responses were combined with theory-derived practices to create the MRMS. In Study 2, we administered the MRMS in three international online surveys (N = 4,290) to assess factor structure and construct validity. Factor analysis revealed nine practices: disclosure of one's extra-pair attractions to a partner, open communication about jealousy, compersion, willingness to care for unrelated children, shared extra-pair sexual experiences, partner (non)hierarchy, sexual health maintenance, thoughtful resource distribution among partners, and reputation management. Data from one of the three surveys (n = 871) showed that each practice had distinctive patterns of association with previous CNM experience, relationship and sexual satisfaction, partner investment and interdependence, and self-reported infidelity (i.e., how often extra-pair interactions feel to violate an existing relationship's agreements). We discuss how the MRMS may be used to study how people in CNM relationships maintain multiple intimate relationships.

Archives of Sexual Behavior
New Mexico State University (US), Pasadena City College (US), John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), California Institute of Technology (US), University of South Carolina Salkehatchie (US), Kadir Has University (TR), Texas State University (US), University of Bucharest (RO), University of Turku (FI), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of New Mexico (US), Oakland University (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Chapman University (US), Kansas State University (US), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Charles University (CZ), University of Cambridge (GB), Swansea University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Institute of Psychology (PL), Oregon Medical Research Center (US), Jacobs (United States) (US), Poznań University of Technology (PL), Brunel University of London (GB), Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL), Comenius University Bratislava (SK), The University of Texas at Austin (US), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US), Hologic (Germany) (DE), University of Bologna (IT), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.