The Utility of Routine Postoperative Radiographs Following Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Postoperative cervical spine radiographs are routinely obtained during in-hospital and follow-up period. We aim to evaluate the utility of postoperative radiographs for identifying instrumentation failure and the subsequent need for revision surgery in patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: A retrospective chart review of patients who had surgical treatment for traumatic cervical spine injury was conducted. Clinical notes and radiographic reports were evaluated. Postoperative radiographs were obtained prior to discharge from the hospital, and subsequently at 2, 6, 12, 24 weeks, and 1 year. Patients who underwent revision surgery, described as any reoperation, were identified. The patients' indications for surgery were evaluated. The results of postoperative radiographs that prompted a change in management and reoperation were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity for postoperative radiographs were calculated. <b>Results</b>: A total of 295 patients were reviewed. The rate of revision surgery was 3.7% (<i>n</i> = 11). All 11 patients presented changes in clinical findings and physical exam, but only 3 patients (1%) were identified to have undergone revision surgery due to instrumentation failure seen on radiographs at 13, 89, and 112 days postoperatively, and none within the inpatient period. Two patients underwent revision surgery due to epidural hematoma, and six patients due to wound infection. The overall sensitivity and specificity of routine postoperative radiographs were 27% and 100%, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: Postoperative radiographs after cervical spine trauma have low clinical utility for predicting instrumentation failure in the absence of clinical findings, particularly in the inpatient period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062231
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Utility of Routine Postoperative Radiographs Following Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries

Usman Zareef, Robin Fencel, Vishal A. Khatri, Julio Jose Jauregui et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

The Utility of Routine Postoperative Radiographs Following Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries

Usman Zareef, Robin Fencel, Vishal A. Khatri, Julio Jose Jauregui, Ryan A. Curto, Husni Alasadi, Evan L. Honig, Hershil A. Patel, Alexander Padovano, Sapan Patel, Rohan I. Suresh, Louis J. Bivona, Keerthana Srinivasan, Steven C. Ludwig, Eugene Y. Koh, Daniel L. Cavanaugh
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Postoperative cervical spine radiographs are routinely obtained during in-hospital and follow-up period. We aim to evaluate the utility of postoperative radiographs for identifying instrumentation failure and the subsequent need for revision surgery in patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: A retrospective chart review of patients who had surgical treatment for traumatic cervical spine injury was conducted. Clinical notes and radiographic reports were evaluated. Postoperative radiographs were obtained prior to discharge from the hospital, and subsequently at 2, 6, 12, 24 weeks, and 1 year. Patients who underwent revision surgery, described as any reoperation, were identified. The patients' indications for surgery were evaluated. The results of postoperative radiographs that prompted a change in management and reoperation were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity for postoperative radiographs were calculated. <b>Results</b>: A total of 295 patients were reviewed. The rate of revision surgery was 3.7% (<i>n</i> = 11). All 11 patients presented changes in clinical findings and physical exam, but only 3 patients (1%) were identified to have undergone revision surgery due to instrumentation failure seen on radiographs at 13, 89, and 112 days postoperatively, and none within the inpatient period. Two patients underwent revision surgery due to epidural hematoma, and six patients due to wound infection. The overall sensitivity and specificity of routine postoperative radiographs were 27% and 100%, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: Postoperative radiographs after cervical spine trauma have low clinical utility for predicting instrumentation failure in the absence of clinical findings, particularly in the inpatient period.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(6)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.