Ethics and regulatory guidance to address the challenges encountered in research on rare diseases in a multinational dimension: the experience of a European funded programme

The rare diseases (RD) research framework presents unique challenges, impacting on ethics and regulatory compliance. Sixty-five projects funded by the European Joint Programme for Rare Diseases (EJP RD) were analysed to identify key ethics and regulatory issues encountered by researchers and to describe the ethics and regulatory guidance provided in the framework of this European-funded Programme. These projects underwent the Ethics Follow-up process throughout their lifecycle. Most of the projects (58) addressed issues related to human participants and personal data, with 28 processing genetic data, 26 handling biospecimens, 24 involving children, and 30 engaging with non-EU countries. The consistent guidance provided to researchers played a significant role in achieving a high level of ethical compliance. Only 5 projects were unable to complete the Ethics Follow-up process, and 10 showed deviations. The most common issues were delayed ethics approvals (7 projects) and missing informed consent or assent documents (6 projects). Among the 60 projects that completed the process, 50 fully adhered to all ethical provisions, while 8 did not meet at least one ethical requirement. Interestingly, regulatory procedures were predominantly overlooked, with only 2 projects reporting their implementation. This highlights a gap in researchers’ awareness of the critical role of regulatory compliance in ensuring research credibility and translational success. Our findings emphasize that while EJP RD’s guidance significantly supported ethics compliance, a more robust focus on regulatory awareness is essential. Initiatives to improve understanding of regulatory landscapes and their integration into RD research are urgently needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01370-7
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics and regulatory guidance to address the challenges encountered in research on rare diseases in a multinational dimension: the experience of a European funded programme

Silvia Torretta, Daria Julkowska, Annunziata D’Ercole, Annalisa Landi et al.
BMC Medical Ethics
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Ethics and regulatory guidance to address the challenges encountered in research on rare diseases in a multinational dimension: the experience of a European funded programme

Silvia Torretta, Daria Julkowska, Annunziata D’Ercole, Annalisa Landi, Marta del Álamo, Viviana Giannuzzi, Anne Demoisy, Joana Namorado, Spencer Gibson, Yanis Mimouni
article en

Abstract

The rare diseases (RD) research framework presents unique challenges, impacting on ethics and regulatory compliance. Sixty-five projects funded by the European Joint Programme for Rare Diseases (EJP RD) were analysed to identify key ethics and regulatory issues encountered by researchers and to describe the ethics and regulatory guidance provided in the framework of this European-funded Programme. These projects underwent the Ethics Follow-up process throughout their lifecycle. Most of the projects (58) addressed issues related to human participants and personal data, with 28 processing genetic data, 26 handling biospecimens, 24 involving children, and 30 engaging with non-EU countries. The consistent guidance provided to researchers played a significant role in achieving a high level of ethical compliance. Only 5 projects were unable to complete the Ethics Follow-up process, and 10 showed deviations. The most common issues were delayed ethics approvals (7 projects) and missing informed consent or assent documents (6 projects). Among the 60 projects that completed the process, 50 fully adhered to all ethical provisions, while 8 did not meet at least one ethical requirement. Interestingly, regulatory procedures were predominantly overlooked, with only 2 projects reporting their implementation. This highlights a gap in researchers’ awareness of the critical role of regulatory compliance in ensuring research credibility and translational success. Our findings emphasize that while EJP RD’s guidance significantly supported ethics compliance, a more robust focus on regulatory awareness is essential. Initiatives to improve understanding of regulatory landscapes and their integration into RD research are urgently needed.

BMC Medical Ethics
University of Leicester (GB), Inserm (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi Onlus (IT), European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (FR), Águas de Portugal (Portugal) (PT), Hôpital Charles-Foix (FR), Immunomedics (Germany) (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.