Effects of a wrapping closure lacing system on wearing comfort, lock-in stability, and lower-limb muscle demand during prolonged running

Introduction Wrapping closure systems are alternative footwear lacing methods that could influence perceived fit and movement biomechanics, yet their performance during prolonged running and impacts on muscle activities remain underexplored. This study compared the effects of a wrapping closure system (dial-based lacing system, DLS) and conventional laces (CL) on wearing comfort, lock-in stability, running kinematics, and lower-limb muscle activation in trained marathoners during an extended running session. Methods Twenty marathoners completed two 50-minute treadmill running trials on separate days using either DLS or CL. Wearing comfort was indicated by donning/doffing time and repeated VAS ratings. Lock-in stability was evaluated via dorsal foot pressure measures, shoe-throat width, and incidence of lace loosening. Running kinematics were assessed by motion capture and musculoskeletal modeling. Surface EMG was recorded from four lower-leg muscles. Between-group differences were examined statistically. Results DLS produced shorter donning/doffing time and lower discomfort ratings during the mid-to-late running stage compared to CL ( p < 0.025). There was no incidence of lace loosening in DLS while that of CL was 10% ( p = 0.500). Pressure fluctuations and peak tibialis anterior activation were significantly smaller in DLS than CL ( p < 0.036) at several time checkpoints of the running trials. No significant differences were observed in other kinematic and EMG measures. Conclusion DLS demonstrated greater wearing comfort than CL. DLS also reduced variability in dorsal foot pressure and lowered local muscular demand without altering overall running kinematics, which indicates the potential advantage of DLS in maintaining foot–shoe coupling during endurance running.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1775046
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of a wrapping closure lacing system on wearing comfort, lock-in stability, and lower-limb muscle demand during prolonged running

N. Zhang, Tony Lin‐Wei Chen, Wei Huang, Ming Zhang et al.
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Effects of a wrapping closure lacing system on wearing comfort, lock-in stability, and lower-limb muscle demand during prolonged running

N. Zhang, Tony Lin‐Wei Chen, Wei Huang, Ming Zhang, Yichen Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction Wrapping closure systems are alternative footwear lacing methods that could influence perceived fit and movement biomechanics, yet their performance during prolonged running and impacts on muscle activities remain underexplored. This study compared the effects of a wrapping closure system (dial-based lacing system, DLS) and conventional laces (CL) on wearing comfort, lock-in stability, running kinematics, and lower-limb muscle activation in trained marathoners during an extended running session. Methods Twenty marathoners completed two 50-minute treadmill running trials on separate days using either DLS or CL. Wearing comfort was indicated by donning/doffing time and repeated VAS ratings. Lock-in stability was evaluated via dorsal foot pressure measures, shoe-throat width, and incidence of lace loosening. Running kinematics were assessed by motion capture and musculoskeletal modeling. Surface EMG was recorded from four lower-leg muscles. Between-group differences were examined statistically. Results DLS produced shorter donning/doffing time and lower discomfort ratings during the mid-to-late running stage compared to CL ( p < 0.025). There was no incidence of lace loosening in DLS while that of CL was 10% ( p = 0.500). Pressure fluctuations and peak tibialis anterior activation were significantly smaller in DLS than CL ( p < 0.036) at several time checkpoints of the running trials. No significant differences were observed in other kinematic and EMG measures. Conclusion DLS demonstrated greater wearing comfort than CL. DLS also reduced variability in dorsal foot pressure and lowered local muscular demand without altering overall running kinematics, which indicates the potential advantage of DLS in maintaining foot–shoe coupling during endurance running.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 8
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Intelligent Health (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.