Long-term survival outcomes of robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis

There was no difference in OS for patients with stage I endometrial cancer treated with robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic surgery. These data demonstrate excellent survival outcomes in this cohort and do not favor a robotic-assisted or traditional laparoscopic approach. However, the full extent of a route-of-surgery decision may not be detected given the potential for late recurrences and deaths, highlighting the need for large, prospective studies with long duration of follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gynecologic Oncology
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.02.035
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term survival outcomes of robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis

Peter A. Argenta, Allison C. Dona, Sarah Boyle, Rachel I. Vogel
Gynecologic Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Long-term survival outcomes of robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis

Peter A. Argenta, Allison C. Dona, Sarah Boyle, Rachel I. Vogel
article en

Abstract

There was no difference in OS for patients with stage I endometrial cancer treated with robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic surgery. These data demonstrate excellent survival outcomes in this cohort and do not favor a robotic-assisted or traditional laparoscopic approach. However, the full extent of a route-of-surgery decision may not be detected given the potential for late recurrences and deaths, highlighting the need for large, prospective studies with long duration of follow-up.

Gynecologic OncologyVol. 207
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), Minnesota Department of Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Long-term survival outcomes of robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis — Peter A. Argenta, Allison C. Dona, et al. · Gynecologic Oncology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS