Cube and Integral Attacks on ChiLow-32

The protection of executable code in embedded systems requires efficient mechanisms that ensure confidentiality and integrity. Belkheyar et al. recently proposed the Authenticated Code Encryption (ACE) framework, with ChiLow as the first ACE-2 instantiation at EUROCRYPT 2025. ChiLow-(32 + τ ) is a 32-bit tweakable block cipher combined with a pseudorandom function, featuring quadratic nonlinear layers called ChiChi (χχ) and a nested tweak/key schedule optimized for low-latency decryptions in secure code execution under strict query limits.In this paper, we exploit the algebraic structure of χχ and study the resistance of ChiLow-(32 + τ ) to cube-like and integral cryptanalysis in single- and multiple-tweak settings. In the multiple-tweak setting, we present conditional attacks that can recover the full key for 5-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ) with practical complexity, and extend the analysis to 6 rounds at a still non-trivial but purely theoretical cost below brute force. We additionally construct borderline cube attacks on 5- and 6-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ), each capable of recovering the full key with practical complexity. Specifically, we recover the full key for 5-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ) using 232 decryptions, 218.58 chosen ciphertext data, and 233.56 bits of memory, and for 6-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ) using 234 decryptions, 233.58 chosen ciphertext data, and 254.28 bits of memory.We then focus on integral cryptanalysis and the challenge of extending the analysis to 7 rounds. We identify integral distinguishers in the single- and multiple-tweak models and extend suitable 2-round and 3-round integral distinguishers to build a 7-round attack. We present a nested strategy to recover all round tweaks and tackle the problem of deriving the master key from round-tweak and key information. Our key-recovery method exploits high-degree monomials that arise in the integral key-recovery phase to reduce the average number of guessed key bits and hence reduce the time complexity. As a result, we mount a 7-round key-recovery attack on ChiLow-(32 + τ ) that requires 26.32 chosen ciphertext data, has a time complexity of about 2108.55 encryptions, and needs negligible memory.Notably, all our attacks remain consistent with the security claims of the design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46586/tosc.v2026.i1.253-292
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cube and Integral Attacks on ChiLow-32

Hosein Hadipour, Zhongfeng Niu, Jiahui He, Zahra Ahmadian et al.
IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
article

Cube and Integral Attacks on ChiLow-32

Hosein Hadipour, Zhongfeng Niu, Jiahui He, Zahra Ahmadian, Akram Khalesi, Kai Hu, S. L. Peng, Mengdi Wang, Shahram Rasoolzadeh
article en

Abstract

The protection of executable code in embedded systems requires efficient mechanisms that ensure confidentiality and integrity. Belkheyar et al. recently proposed the Authenticated Code Encryption (ACE) framework, with ChiLow as the first ACE-2 instantiation at EUROCRYPT 2025. ChiLow-(32 + τ ) is a 32-bit tweakable block cipher combined with a pseudorandom function, featuring quadratic nonlinear layers called ChiChi (χχ) and a nested tweak/key schedule optimized for low-latency decryptions in secure code execution under strict query limits.In this paper, we exploit the algebraic structure of χχ and study the resistance of ChiLow-(32 + τ ) to cube-like and integral cryptanalysis in single- and multiple-tweak settings. In the multiple-tweak setting, we present conditional attacks that can recover the full key for 5-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ) with practical complexity, and extend the analysis to 6 rounds at a still non-trivial but purely theoretical cost below brute force. We additionally construct borderline cube attacks on 5- and 6-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ), each capable of recovering the full key with practical complexity. Specifically, we recover the full key for 5-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ) using 232 decryptions, 218.58 chosen ciphertext data, and 233.56 bits of memory, and for 6-round ChiLow-(32 + τ ) using 234 decryptions, 233.58 chosen ciphertext data, and 254.28 bits of memory.We then focus on integral cryptanalysis and the challenge of extending the analysis to 7 rounds. We identify integral distinguishers in the single- and multiple-tweak models and extend suitable 2-round and 3-round integral distinguishers to build a 7-round attack. We present a nested strategy to recover all round tweaks and tackle the problem of deriving the master key from round-tweak and key information. Our key-recovery method exploits high-degree monomials that arise in the integral key-recovery phase to reduce the average number of guessed key bits and hence reduce the time complexity. As a result, we mount a 7-round key-recovery attack on ChiLow-(32 + τ ) that requires 26.32 chosen ciphertext data, has a time complexity of about 2108.55 encryptions, and needs negligible memory.Notably, all our attacks remain consistent with the security claims of the design.

IACR Transactions on Symmetric CryptologyVol. 2026(1)
Nanyang Technological University (SG), State Key Laboratory of Cryptology (CN), Shahid Beheshti University (IR), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN), Ruhr University Bochum (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Government of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, Vlaamse regering
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.