"Religion and the State in Contemporary Islamic Discourse: Between Ideology and Ontology"The Guardianship of the Jurist as a Model

This study aims to analyze the complex relationship between religion and the state in contemporary Islamic discourse by exploring its representations along two main dimensions: the ideological, which seeks to instrumentalize religion as a political tool, and the ontological, which considers religion as a constitutive element of Islamic being and existential framework. The research is based on the hypothesis that contemporary Islamic discourse—whether in its activist form (political Islam) or reformist (renaissance-oriented)—suffers from a methodological and conceptual duality when addressing the issue of the state. While some movements rely on a comprehensive ideology that views the establishment of an "Islamic state" as essential to achieving Shari'ah objectives, other currents adopt an ontological approach that sees religion as a value system that should serve as a moral and ethical reference for the state without manifesting as a theocratic political system. The study examines the development of traditional Islamic concepts such as imamate and caliphate, and compares them with modern state concepts such as sovereignty, law, and pluralism. It also highlights how contemporary Islamic thinkers—such as Mohammed Abed Al-Jabri, Abdallah Laroui, Rached Ghannouchi, and Taha Abdurrahman—have approached the dilemma of the connection or separation between the religious and political spheres. The research focuses on the tension between a religious discourse rooted in interpretive texts and the political reality imposed by the modern nation-state. It discusses how concepts like "Hakimiyya" (divine sovereignty), "Islamic reference," and "loyalty and disavowal" are employed to reshape the religion–state relationship according to balances of power, legitimacy, and identity. The study concludes that the future of the religion–state relationship in the Islamic world depends on overcoming the instrumental ideological use of religion on the one hand, and developing an ontological understanding of religion as a spiritual and moral force capable of engaging with modernity without succumbing to alienation or political sanctification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63677/jqlap.2025.189997
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Religion and the State in Contemporary Islamic Discourse: Between Ideology and Ontology"The Guardianship of the Jurist as a Model

Abdullah Hassani
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Islamic Studies and History
article

"Religion and the State in Contemporary Islamic Discourse: Between Ideology and Ontology"The Guardianship of the Jurist as a Model

Abdullah Hassani
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the complex relationship between religion and the state in contemporary Islamic discourse by exploring its representations along two main dimensions: the ideological, which seeks to instrumentalize religion as a political tool, and the ontological, which considers religion as a constitutive element of Islamic being and existential framework. The research is based on the hypothesis that contemporary Islamic discourse—whether in its activist form (political Islam) or reformist (renaissance-oriented)—suffers from a methodological and conceptual duality when addressing the issue of the state. While some movements rely on a comprehensive ideology that views the establishment of an "Islamic state" as essential to achieving Shari'ah objectives, other currents adopt an ontological approach that sees religion as a value system that should serve as a moral and ethical reference for the state without manifesting as a theocratic political system. The study examines the development of traditional Islamic concepts such as imamate and caliphate, and compares them with modern state concepts such as sovereignty, law, and pluralism. It also highlights how contemporary Islamic thinkers—such as Mohammed Abed Al-Jabri, Abdallah Laroui, Rached Ghannouchi, and Taha Abdurrahman—have approached the dilemma of the connection or separation between the religious and political spheres. The research focuses on the tension between a religious discourse rooted in interpretive texts and the political reality imposed by the modern nation-state. It discusses how concepts like "Hakimiyya" (divine sovereignty), "Islamic reference," and "loyalty and disavowal" are employed to reshape the religion–state relationship according to balances of power, legitimacy, and identity. The study concludes that the future of the religion–state relationship in the Islamic world depends on overcoming the instrumental ideological use of religion on the one hand, and developing an ontological understanding of religion as a spiritual and moral force capable of engaging with modernity without succumbing to alienation or political sanctification.

AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political SciencesVol. 16(Issue: 2 part 1)
University of Wasit (IQ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

"Religion and the State in Contemporary Islamic Discourse: Between Ideology and Ontology"The Guardianship of the Jurist as a Model — Abdullah Hassani · AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS