Barriers to Inclusive Clinical Trials for Diabetes: A Survey of Clinical Trial Awareness and Engagement Among People With Diabetes and Their Caregivers

OBJECTIVE To assess awareness, participation, and perceptions of clinical trials and regulatory processes among people with diabetes and their caregivers, with a focus on identifying barriers and motivators to participation and evaluating disparities by race, ethnicity, and diabetes type. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two phases (August–September 2023 and April–May 2024) among adults with diabetes or their caregivers. The 31-item questionnaire, developed by the research team, assessed awareness, motivators, barriers, understanding, and satisfaction with clinical trial participation. A total of 5,487 responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Although clinical trial awareness was generally high, people from racial and ethnic minority communities (PREM) were less likely than White participants to know what a clinical trial was (1.2 times less), be informed by their care team (1.5 times less), or have participated in a trial (3.3 times less). PREM more often cited financial compensation (74.5%) as motivation and fear of harm (39.4%) or participation costs (34.9%) as barriers, compared with White participants. They had lower understanding of trial purposes (70% vs. 99.6%), receipt of results after participation (57% vs. 99.5%), and awareness of study design and regulatory engagement opportunities (22.7% vs. 97.7%), compared with White participants. CONCLUSIONS Significant disparities in clinical trial awareness, engagement, and satisfaction exist among racial and ethnic minority populations with diabetes. These inequities reflect social determinants of health including limited access to care, economic barriers, and historical mistrust and underscore the need for proactive clinician communication, culturally responsive outreach, and equitable inclusion across all stages of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Cardiometabolic CARE
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/doci26-0002
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to Inclusive Clinical Trials for Diabetes: A Survey of Clinical Trial Awareness and Engagement Among People With Diabetes and Their Caregivers

Eiman Ibrahim, Raveendhara R. Bannuru, Alissa R. Segal, Osagie A. Ebekozien et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Cardiometabolic CARE
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Barriers to Inclusive Clinical Trials for Diabetes: A Survey of Clinical Trial Awareness and Engagement Among People With Diabetes and Their Caregivers

Eiman Ibrahim, Raveendhara R. Bannuru, Alissa R. Segal, Osagie A. Ebekozien, Oge Okeke, Aicha Hassanein, Jude AbdElMoneim, Terri Wiggins, Nuha ElSayed
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess awareness, participation, and perceptions of clinical trials and regulatory processes among people with diabetes and their caregivers, with a focus on identifying barriers and motivators to participation and evaluating disparities by race, ethnicity, and diabetes type. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two phases (August–September 2023 and April–May 2024) among adults with diabetes or their caregivers. The 31-item questionnaire, developed by the research team, assessed awareness, motivators, barriers, understanding, and satisfaction with clinical trial participation. A total of 5,487 responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Although clinical trial awareness was generally high, people from racial and ethnic minority communities (PREM) were less likely than White participants to know what a clinical trial was (1.2 times less), be informed by their care team (1.5 times less), or have participated in a trial (3.3 times less). PREM more often cited financial compensation (74.5%) as motivation and fear of harm (39.4%) or participation costs (34.9%) as barriers, compared with White participants. They had lower understanding of trial purposes (70% vs. 99.6%), receipt of results after participation (57% vs. 99.5%), and awareness of study design and regulatory engagement opportunities (22.7% vs. 97.7%), compared with White participants. CONCLUSIONS Significant disparities in clinical trial awareness, engagement, and satisfaction exist among racial and ethnic minority populations with diabetes. These inequities reflect social determinants of health including limited access to care, economic barriers, and historical mistrust and underscore the need for proactive clinician communication, culturally responsive outreach, and equitable inclusion across all stages of research.

Diabetes Obesity and Cardiometabolic CARE
Tufts University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), American Diabetes Association (US), Harvard University (US), George Mason University (US), Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US), Association for Language Learning (GB), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.