The Medical Student Performance Evaluation in global medical education: addressing a missing Middle Eastern perspective

Background An essential part of the residency selection process is the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE), which provides an organized overview of the performance of undergraduate medical students. Despite the Association of American Medical Colleges’ (AAMC) extensive guidelines, there is still considerable variation in MSPE content, interpretation, and application among schools. Furthermore, limited published data exist regarding the adaptation and application of MSPE frameworks outside of North America. Methods This narrative review was conducted using a structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed articles, national guidelines, and policy documents addressing MSPE structure, implementation, standardization, and program director perspectives. Relevant literature was synthesized thematically. In addition, the establishment and implementation of the MSPE at Alfaisal University were examined as an institutional case example. Results The review summarizes the MSPE’s historical evolution and examines ongoing challenges related to grading variability, narrative evaluation, professionalism reporting, transparency, comparability, and standardization. It also explores the presence of MSPE-equivalent systems in the Middle East, where peer-reviewed analyses and formalized guidance remain limited. The Alfaisal University model demonstrates how systematic data collection, narrative clarity, and structured faculty participation can support the implementation of standardized evaluation frameworks in a non-North American educational setting. Conclusion By situating an institutional experience within the broader medical education literature, this review contributes to discussions on learner evaluation, cross-institutional comparability, and the globalization of assessment standards. The observations presented may inform medical schools, educators, and policymakers seeking to develop fair and transparent performance evaluation systems across diverse educational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1786429
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Medical Student Performance Evaluation in global medical education: addressing a missing Middle Eastern perspective

Abderrahman Ouban, Fouad Jabri, Bader Taftafa, Abdulaziz Mhannayeh et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Innovations in Medical Education
article

The Medical Student Performance Evaluation in global medical education: addressing a missing Middle Eastern perspective

Abderrahman Ouban, Fouad Jabri, Bader Taftafa, Abdulaziz Mhannayeh, Dania Sibai, Abdullah Jabri, Mohamed Alsharif
article en

Abstract

Background An essential part of the residency selection process is the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE), which provides an organized overview of the performance of undergraduate medical students. Despite the Association of American Medical Colleges’ (AAMC) extensive guidelines, there is still considerable variation in MSPE content, interpretation, and application among schools. Furthermore, limited published data exist regarding the adaptation and application of MSPE frameworks outside of North America. Methods This narrative review was conducted using a structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed articles, national guidelines, and policy documents addressing MSPE structure, implementation, standardization, and program director perspectives. Relevant literature was synthesized thematically. In addition, the establishment and implementation of the MSPE at Alfaisal University were examined as an institutional case example. Results The review summarizes the MSPE’s historical evolution and examines ongoing challenges related to grading variability, narrative evaluation, professionalism reporting, transparency, comparability, and standardization. It also explores the presence of MSPE-equivalent systems in the Middle East, where peer-reviewed analyses and formalized guidance remain limited. The Alfaisal University model demonstrates how systematic data collection, narrative clarity, and structured faculty participation can support the implementation of standardized evaluation frameworks in a non-North American educational setting. Conclusion By situating an institutional experience within the broader medical education literature, this review contributes to discussions on learner evaluation, cross-institutional comparability, and the globalization of assessment standards. The observations presented may inform medical schools, educators, and policymakers seeking to develop fair and transparent performance evaluation systems across diverse educational contexts.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Alfaisal University (SA), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Alfaisal University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.