The generative AI ethics landscape as seen by Chinese middle school students

With the rapid integration of Generative AI in education, understanding students' ethical perspectives is crucial for effective AI ethics education. Five hundred and ninety four middle school students' agreement levels on five AI ethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, autonomy, explicability) adapted from previous research, and the rationales underlying their choices were investigated using a questionnaire. Results showed that students expressed the highest agreement with “beneficence” and “autonomy,” though overall responses leaned toward neutrality. Independent AI use and family discussions predicted higher agreement; urban-rural differences were non-significant. Qualitative analysis identified themes in students' ethical reasoning. These findings offer evidence-based guidance for adolescent AI ethics education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1777855
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The generative AI ethics landscape as seen by Chinese middle school students

Yefeng Lu, Suping Yi, Yanyan Zhang, Xin Wan
Frontiers in Psychology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The generative AI ethics landscape as seen by Chinese middle school students

Yefeng Lu, Suping Yi, Yanyan Zhang, Xin Wan
article en

Abstract

With the rapid integration of Generative AI in education, understanding students' ethical perspectives is crucial for effective AI ethics education. Five hundred and ninety four middle school students' agreement levels on five AI ethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, autonomy, explicability) adapted from previous research, and the rationales underlying their choices were investigated using a questionnaire. Results showed that students expressed the highest agreement with “beneficence” and “autonomy,” though overall responses leaned toward neutrality. Independent AI use and family discussions predicted higher agreement; urban-rural differences were non-significant. Qualitative analysis identified themes in students' ethical reasoning. These findings offer evidence-based guidance for adolescent AI ethics education.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Jiangsu Second Normal University (CN), Huzhou Normal University (CN), Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Government of Jiangsu Province, Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.