Enhancing Membrane Adhesion to Polymeric Substrates via Plasma Treatment

Ensuring strong adhesion between porous polymeric membranes and supporting substrates is critical for the reliability and functionality of membrane devices. However, due to the innate low surface energy of polymers, achieving strong chemical bonding between such materials remains challenging. In addition, the small-pore size of membranes often limits effective pore intrusion (necessary for achieving effective mechanical interlocking) by polymer adhesives during high-throughput manufacturing. Plasma treatment is commonly used to modify the surface energy of polymers to improve adhesion and mechanical properties of composite systems. However, it remains unexplored whether the method is effective in improving the adhesion of surfaces containing nanoscale pores as found in membranes. Herein, we demonstrate that adhesion between poly(ethersulfone) (PES) membranes with 20 and 200 nm pore sizes and polypropylene (PP) substrates is enhanced by low-pressure plasma treatment (power: 30 W, duration: 60 s, gas flow rate: 30 cm3/min) of the two surfaces. Thermomechanical bonding between the treated surfaces is performed, and the adhesion behavior is quantified by a T-peel test and imaging analysis. For the 200 nm PES membranes and PP substrate, the adhesion after plasma treatment (152–405 N/m), measured by the interfacial fracture toughness, exhibits an improvement by 0.12 to 2 times in comparison to untreated control samples (114–156 N/m). For the 20 nm PES membranes and PP substrate, the adhesion after plasma treatment (14–242 N/m) exhibits an improvement by 0.13 to 20 times in comparison to that of untreated control samples (12–96 N/m). Among the different types of plasma treatment tested, the oxygen-containing plasmas produce the largest enhancement in adhesion. When benchmarked against the adhesion of densified, nonporous PES film and PP substrates after plasma treatments (0–20 N/m), the adhesion is improved by 13 to 37 times for the 200 nm PES/PP specimens and by 1.5 to 17 times for the 20 nm PES/PP specimens, showcasing the importance of mechanical interlocking due to membrane pore structure for adhesion. This study shows that there is a synergistic effect of chemical bonding and mechanical interlocking on the interfacial fracture toughness between porous membranes and thermoplastic substrates, which can be useful in guiding the membrane bonding process in a variety of applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Polymer Materials
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.5c04051
Primary Topic
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Membrane Adhesion to Polymeric Substrates via Plasma Treatment

Sean Foley, Rajan Jain, Christina Carbrello, Kathy Youngbear et al.
ACS Applied Polymer Materials
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
article

Enhancing Membrane Adhesion to Polymeric Substrates via Plasma Treatment

Sean Foley, Rajan Jain, Christina Carbrello, Kathy Youngbear, Yifu Ding, Rong Long
article en

Abstract

Ensuring strong adhesion between porous polymeric membranes and supporting substrates is critical for the reliability and functionality of membrane devices. However, due to the innate low surface energy of polymers, achieving strong chemical bonding between such materials remains challenging. In addition, the small-pore size of membranes often limits effective pore intrusion (necessary for achieving effective mechanical interlocking) by polymer adhesives during high-throughput manufacturing. Plasma treatment is commonly used to modify the surface energy of polymers to improve adhesion and mechanical properties of composite systems. However, it remains unexplored whether the method is effective in improving the adhesion of surfaces containing nanoscale pores as found in membranes. Herein, we demonstrate that adhesion between poly(ethersulfone) (PES) membranes with 20 and 200 nm pore sizes and polypropylene (PP) substrates is enhanced by low-pressure plasma treatment (power: 30 W, duration: 60 s, gas flow rate: 30 cm3/min) of the two surfaces. Thermomechanical bonding between the treated surfaces is performed, and the adhesion behavior is quantified by a T-peel test and imaging analysis. For the 200 nm PES membranes and PP substrate, the adhesion after plasma treatment (152–405 N/m), measured by the interfacial fracture toughness, exhibits an improvement by 0.12 to 2 times in comparison to untreated control samples (114–156 N/m). For the 20 nm PES membranes and PP substrate, the adhesion after plasma treatment (14–242 N/m) exhibits an improvement by 0.13 to 20 times in comparison to that of untreated control samples (12–96 N/m). Among the different types of plasma treatment tested, the oxygen-containing plasmas produce the largest enhancement in adhesion. When benchmarked against the adhesion of densified, nonporous PES film and PP substrates after plasma treatments (0–20 N/m), the adhesion is improved by 13 to 37 times for the 200 nm PES/PP specimens and by 1.5 to 17 times for the 20 nm PES/PP specimens, showcasing the importance of mechanical interlocking due to membrane pore structure for adhesion. This study shows that there is a synergistic effect of chemical bonding and mechanical interlocking on the interfacial fracture toughness between porous membranes and thermoplastic substrates, which can be useful in guiding the membrane bonding process in a variety of applications.

ACS Applied Polymer MaterialsVol. 8(6)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US), Membrane Technology & Research (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.